Suppr超能文献

通过使用模糊解释类别提高小儿阑尾超声诊断准确性

Improvement in diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound of the pediatric appendix through the use of equivocal interpretive categories.

作者信息

Larson David B, Trout Andrew T, Fierke Shelby R, Towbin Alexander J

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3026.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):849-56. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13026.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound of the pediatric appendix using standardized structured reports that incorporate equivocal interpretive categories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standardized structured appendix ultrasound reports using a five-category interpretive scheme were reviewed. Interpretive categories were positive, intermediate likelihood, or negative when the appendix was visualized, and secondary signs or no secondary signs when the appendix was not visualized. Interpretations were compared with clinical and pathologic follow-up. Diagnostic accuracy was compared with the accuracy of a simulated binary interpretive scheme based on the same data.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred fifty-seven examinations were included, with appendicitis present in 16.9% (230/1357) of cases. The appendix was visualized in 47.2% (641/1357) of cases, with interpretations as follows: positive, 27.5% (176/641); intermediate likelihood, 9.7% (62/641); and normal, 62.9% (403/641). The appendicitis rate in each group was 92.6% (163/176), 25.8% (16/62), and 0.5% (2/403), respectively. The appendix was not visualized in 52.8% (716/1357) of cases, with secondary findings identified in 8.5% (61/716) and no secondary findings in 91.5% (655/716) of cases. The appendicitis rate was 39.3% (24/61) and 3.8% (25/655) in these groups, respectively. Appendicitis was present in 32.5% of equivocal (intermediate likelihood and not visualized, secondary findings) cases and 2.6% of negative (normal and not visualized, no secondary findings) cases. Diagnostic accuracy of a five-category scheme was 96.8% versus 94.1% for a binary scheme.

CONCLUSION

Appendix ultrasound examinations interpreted according to a scheme that incorporates equivocal categories better convey diagnostic certainty and increase diagnostic accuracy compared with a binary interpretive scheme.

摘要

目的

本文旨在评估使用纳入模糊解释类别的标准化结构化报告的小儿阑尾超声诊断性能。

材料与方法

回顾使用五类解释方案的标准化结构化阑尾超声报告。当阑尾可视化时,解释类别为阳性、中等可能性或阴性;当阑尾未可视化时,为有次要征象或无次要征象。将解释结果与临床和病理随访结果进行比较。基于相同数据,将诊断准确性与模拟二元解释方案的准确性进行比较。

结果

共纳入1357例检查,其中16.9%(230/1357)的病例患有阑尾炎。47.2%(641/1357)的病例中阑尾可见,其解释如下:阳性,27.5%(176/641);中等可能性,9.7%(62/641);正常,62.9%(403/641)。每组的阑尾炎发生率分别为92.6%(163/176)、25.8%(16/62)和0.5%(2/403)。52.8%(716/1357)的病例中阑尾不可见,其中8.5%(61/716)有次要发现,91.5%(655/716)无次要发现。这些组中的阑尾炎发生率分别为39.3%(24/61)和3.8%(25/655)。在模糊(中等可能性且不可见、有次要发现)病例中,32.5%存在阑尾炎;在阴性(正常且不可见、无次要发现)病例中,2.6%存在阑尾炎。五类方案的诊断准确性为96.8%,而二元方案为94.1%。

结论

与二元解释方案相比,根据纳入模糊类别的方案解释阑尾超声检查能更好地传达诊断确定性并提高诊断准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验