Suppr超能文献

Comparison of epinephrine and dopamine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

作者信息

Lindner K H, Ahnefeld F W, Bowdler I M

机构信息

Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Ulm University, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1989;15(7):432-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00255598.

Abstract

The effectiveness of epinephrine and dopamine for restoring spontaneous circulation after asphyxial or fibrillatory cardiac arrest was compared using a porcine model. Asphyxial arrest: 7 animals received 45 micrograms/kg epinephrine, 7 animals 2.5 mg/kg dopamine, the remaining 7 animals received no drug treatment. All 7 animals given epinephrine could be resuscitated after 174 +/- 53 s, spontaneous circulation could be restored in only 3 of 7 animals given dopamine after 487 +/- 63 s and in none of the control animals could spontaneous circulation be established. Ventricular fibrillation: 7 animals were defibrillated without either mechanical measures or drug therapy. The following doses were given before defibrillation and after starting mechanical measures to separate groups of 7 animals each: 45 micrograms/kg epinephrine, 2.5 mg/kg dopamine, or no drug therapy. In the absence of either drug or mechanical measures and with mechanical measures only, spontaneous circulation could not be established in any of the cases. After administration of epinephrine, defibrillation and restoration of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 6 of 7 animals in 667 +/- 216 s, with dopamine, all the animals could be successfully resuscitated in the shorter time of 174 +/- 85 s. Epinephrine was found to be superior to dopamine in the treatment of asphyxial arrest whereas dopamine was found to be better in the management of ventricular fibrillation, probably by improving the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验