Yew Andrew, Lu Derek, Lu Daniel C
Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 May 7;6(Suppl 4):S236-9. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.156603. eCollection 2015.
Translaminar screw fixation has become an alternative in the fixation of the axial and subaxial cervical spine. We report utilization of this approach in the atlas as a salvage technique for atlantoaxial stabilization when C1 lateral mass screws are precluded. To assess the feasibility of translaminar fixation at the atlas, we have characterized the dimensions of the C1 lamina in the general adult population using computed tomography (CT)-based morphometry.
A 46-year-old male with symptomatic atlantoaxial instability secondary to os odontoideum underwent bilateral C1 and C2 translaminar screw/rod fixation as C1 lateral mass fixation was precluded by an anomalous vertebral artery. The follow-up evaluation 2½ years postoperatively revealed an asymptomatic patient without recurrent neck/shoulder pain or clinical signs of instability. To better assess the feasibility of utilizing this approach in the general population, we retrospectively analyzed 502 consecutive cervical CT scans performed over a 3-month period in patients aged over 18 years at a single institution. Measurements of C1 bicortical diameter, bilateral laminar length, height, and angulation were performed. Laminar and screw dimensions were compared to assess instrumentation feasibility.
Review of CT imaging found that 75.9% of C1 lamina had a sufficient bicortical diameter, and 63.7% of C1 lamina had sufficient height to accept bilateral translaminar screw placement.
CT-based measurement of atlas morphology in the general population revealed that a majority of C1 lamina had sufficient dimensions to accept translaminar screw placement. Although these screws appear to be a feasible alternative when lateral mass screws are precluded, further research is required to determine if they provide comparable fixation strength versus traditional instrumentation methods.
经椎板螺钉固定已成为颈椎轴向和下颈椎固定的一种替代方法。我们报告了在C1侧块螺钉无法使用时,将这种方法用于寰椎作为寰枢椎稳定的挽救技术。为了评估寰椎经椎板固定的可行性,我们使用基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的形态测量法对一般成年人群中C1椎板的尺寸进行了特征描述。
一名46岁男性,因齿突骨导致有症状的寰枢椎不稳,由于椎动脉异常而无法进行C1侧块固定,遂接受了双侧C1和C2经椎板螺钉/棒固定。术后2年半的随访评估显示患者无症状,无复发性颈部/肩部疼痛或不稳定的临床体征。为了更好地评估在一般人群中使用这种方法的可行性,我们回顾性分析了在一家机构对18岁以上患者在3个月内连续进行的502例颈椎CT扫描。测量了C1双皮质直径、双侧椎板长度、高度和角度。比较椎板和螺钉尺寸以评估器械置入的可行性。
CT影像回顾发现,75.9%的C1椎板双皮质直径足够,63.7%的C1椎板高度足够以接受双侧经椎板螺钉置入。
基于CT对一般人群寰椎形态的测量显示,大多数C1椎板尺寸足够以接受经椎板螺钉置入。尽管当侧块螺钉无法使用时,这些螺钉似乎是一种可行的替代方法,但仍需要进一步研究以确定它们与传统器械置入方法相比是否能提供相当的固定强度。