Department of Rehabilitation, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;52(2):203-13. Epub 2015 May 26.
The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework for disability outcomes and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) as an outcome measure in stroke.
The aim of this study was to analyze the content of the mRS and the mRS-Systematic Interview (mRS-SI) by linking the scales to the ICF and to explore the association between the mRS and the ICF Core Set for stroke.
Analysis of mRS and mRS-SI using ICF linking rules, as well as quantitative analysis using cross-sectional data.
In- and outpatient settings, community dwelling individuals after stroke.
Both scales were independently linked to the ICF and correlations between the mRS scores and the sum of problems in functioning, deriving from 266 stroke patients, were assessed under the components of the ICF Core Set for Stroke, the domains of 'Activities and Participation' and 15 second level categories linked to the mRS.
Twelve meaningful concepts in the mRS and 40 meaningful concepts in the mRS-SI were identified and linked to different ICF categories, covering 9% and 32% of the ICF Core Set for stroke respectively. The strongest association of the mRS scores was with the number of problems in 'Activities and Participation', especially with the 'Self-care', 'Mobility' and 'Domestic life' domains, as well as with single categories of 'Moving around using equipment', 'Changing basic body position', 'Walking' and 'Carrying out daily routine'.
The content of the mRS and the mRS-SI can be linked to the ICF framework. But the content may not be related to a specific outcome that would be in accordance with the disability terminology suggested by the World Health Organization.
In order to follow the ICF model, interpretation of mRS rating requires caution.
世界卫生组织(WHO)建议将国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)用作残疾结果的概念框架,并将改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)用作中风的结果测量。
本研究旨在通过将量表与 ICF 联系起来,分析 mRS 和 mRS-系统访谈(mRS-SI)的内容,并探讨 mRS 与中风 ICF 核心集之间的关联。
使用 ICF 链接规则分析 mRS 和 mRS-SI,以及使用横断面数据进行定量分析。
中风后住院和门诊患者的社区居住者。
独立地将这两种量表与 ICF 联系起来,并评估 266 名中风患者的功能障碍总分与 mRS 评分之间的相关性,根据中风 ICF 核心集的组成部分、“活动和参与”领域以及与 mRS 相关的 15 个二级类别进行评估。
在 mRS 中确定了 12 个有意义的概念,在 mRS-SI 中确定了 40 个有意义的概念,并将其与不同的 ICF 类别联系起来,分别涵盖中风 ICF 核心集的 9%和 32%。mRS 评分与“活动和参与”的问题数量有最强的关联,尤其是与“自我护理”、“移动”和“日常生活”领域,以及“使用设备移动”、“改变基本体位”、“行走”和“开展日常活动”等单一类别有最强的关联。
mRS 和 mRS-SI 的内容可以与 ICF 框架联系起来。但内容可能与不符合世界卫生组织建议的残疾术语的特定结果无关。
为了遵循 ICF 模型,解读 mRS 评分需要谨慎。