• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Acute bacterial arthritis: how long should you wait for culture results?

作者信息

Balderia Percy Guanzon, Pomerantz Sherry, Fischer Robert

机构信息

From the *Department of Medicine and †Infectious Disease Section, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;21(4):196-8. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000249.

DOI:10.1097/RHU.0000000000000249
PMID:26010183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal incubation period for synovial fluid cultures is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

Our study was designed to determine the positivity rate and time to positivity of synovial fluid cultures from adults with suspected acute bacterial arthritis.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 94 adults who had acute monoarthritis. Patients were classified as low risk or high risk for acute bacterial arthritis. The positivity rate and time to positivity of synovial fluid in combined agar plate and broth culture were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall positivity rate was 22.3% (21 of 94). None of the 21 low-risk patients had a positive culture. Twenty-one (28.7%) of 73 high-risk subjects showed growth, with a mean time to positivity of 36.7 ± 27.1 hours. While half of these turned positive within a day of incubation, growth was detected at up to 90 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute monoarthritis, especially those at high risk for infection, it is reasonable to incubate cultures for 4 days before considering them to be negative.

摘要

相似文献

1
Acute bacterial arthritis: how long should you wait for culture results?
J Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;21(4):196-8. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000249.
2
How common is MRSA in adult septic arthritis?耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)在成人脓毒性关节炎中有多常见?
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.511. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
3
Simulated joint infection assessment by rapid detection of live bacteria with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.通过实时逆转录聚合酶链反应快速检测活细菌进行模拟关节感染评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):602-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00348.
4
Presence of crystals is not an evidence of absence of infection.晶体的存在并不是没有感染的证据。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;31(2):455.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.020. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
5
False negatives of synovial fluid in septic arthritis.脓毒性关节炎中滑液的假阴性结果。
Reumatol Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;12(2):114-5. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
6
Septic arthritis: patients with or without isolated infectious agents have similar characteristics.脓毒性关节炎:有无孤立感染病原体的患者具有相似特征。
Infection. 2014 Apr;42(2):385-91. doi: 10.1007/s15010-013-0567-z. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
7
Retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of isolating bacteria from synovial fluid in dogs with suspected septic arthritis.对疑似感染性关节炎犬的滑液进行细菌分离的疗效回顾性评估。
Aust Vet J. 2015 Jun;93(6):200-3. doi: 10.1111/avj.12328.
8
Use of the isolator 1.5 microbial tube for culture of synovial fluid from patients with septic arthritis.使用隔离器1.5微生物管培养脓毒性关节炎患者的滑液。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Sep;35(9):2410-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.9.2410-2412.1997.
9
Persistence of Staphylococcus aureus as detected by polymerase chain reaction in the synovial fluid of a patient with septic arthritis.通过聚合酶链反应检测到的金黄色葡萄球菌在一名脓毒性关节炎患者滑液中的持续存在。
Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Feb;36(2):203-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.2.203.
10
How sensitive is the synovial fluid white blood cell count in diagnosing septic arthritis?滑膜液白细胞计数在诊断化脓性关节炎方面的敏感度如何?
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):749-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.001.

引用本文的文献

1
C-Reactive Protein Level at Time of Discharge Is Not Predictive of Risk of Reoperation or Readmission in Children With Septic Arthritis.脓毒性关节炎患儿出院时的C反应蛋白水平不能预测再次手术或再次入院的风险。
Front Surg. 2019 Dec 3;6:68. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00068. eCollection 2019.
2
A Real Pain: Diagnostic Quandaries and Septic Arthritis.真正的痛苦:诊断难题与脓毒性关节炎。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jan 24;56(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01358-17. Print 2018 Feb.