Drouin-Chartier Jean-Philippe, Tremblay André J, Bergeron Jean, Pelletier Maude, Laflamme Nathalie, Lamarche Benoît, Couture Patrick
Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Québec, Canada.
Lipid Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
J Clin Apher. 2016 Aug;31(4):359-67. doi: 10.1002/jca.21406. Epub 2015 May 23.
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis (LA) is a reliable method to decrease LDL-C concentrations and remains the gold standard therapy in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of two LA systems [heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation (HELP) vs. dextran sulfate adsorption (DS) on the reduction of lipids, inflammatory markers, and adhesion molecules in a sample of genetically defined HoFH subjects (n = 9)]. Fasting blood samples were collected before and after LA. All subjects served as their own control and were first treated with the HELP system then with DS in this single sequence study. Compared with HELP, DS led to significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol (-63.3% vs. -59.9%; P = 0.05), LDL-C (-70.5% vs. -63.0%; P = 0.02), CRP (-75.3% vs. -48.8%; P < 0.0001), and TNF-α (-23.7% vs. +14.7%; P = 0.003). Reductions in the plasma levels of PCSK9 (-45.3% vs. -63.4%; P = 0.31), lipoprotein (a) (-70.6% vs. -65.0%; P = 0.30), E-selectin (-16.6% vs. -18.3%; P = 0.65), ICAM-1 (-4.0 vs. 5.6%; P = 0.56), and VCAM-1 (8.3% vs. -1.8%; P = 0.08) were not different between the two systems. For the same volume of filtered plasma (3,000 mL), however, HELP led to greater reductions in plasma apoB (-63.1% vs. -58.3%; P = 0.04), HDL-C (-20.6% vs. -6.5%; P = 0.003), and PCSK9 (-63.4% vs. -28.5%; P = 0.02) levels. These results suggest that both LA systems are effective in reducing plasma lipids and inflammatory markers in HoFH. Compared with HELP, greater reductions in lipid levels and inflammatory markers were achieved with DS, most likely because this method allows for a larger plasma volume to be filtered. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:359-367, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
低密度脂蛋白(LDL)分离术(LA)是降低LDL-C浓度的可靠方法,仍是纯合子家族性高胆固醇血症(HoFH)的金标准疗法。本研究的目的是比较两种LA系统[肝素诱导的体外LDL沉淀(HELP)与硫酸葡聚糖吸附(DS)]对一组基因明确的HoFH受试者(n = 9)样本中脂质、炎症标志物和黏附分子的降低效果。在LA前后采集空腹血样。在这项单序列研究中,所有受试者均作为自身对照,首先接受HELP系统治疗,然后接受DS治疗。与HELP相比,DS导致总胆固醇(-63.3%对-59.9%;P = 0.05)、LDL-C(-70.5%对-63.0%;P = 0.02)、CRP(-75.3%对-48.8%;P < 0.0001)和TNF-α(-23.7%对+14.7%;P = 0.003)的降低幅度显著更大。两种系统在PCSK9(-45.3%对-63.4%;P = 0.31)、脂蛋白(a)(-70.6%对-65.0%;P = 0.30)、E-选择素(-16.6%对-18.3%;P = 0.65)、细胞间黏附分子-1(-4.0对5.6%;P = 0.56)和血管细胞黏附分子-1(8.3%对-1.8%;P = 0.08)血浆水平的降低方面无差异。然而,对于相同体积的滤过血浆(3000 mL),HELP导致血浆载脂蛋白B(-63.1%对-58.3%;P = 0.04)、HDL-C(-20.6%对-6.5%;P = 0.003)和PCSK9(-63.4%对-28.5%;P = 0.02)水平的降低幅度更大。这些结果表明,两种LA系统在降低HoFH患者血浆脂质和炎症标志物方面均有效。与HELP相比,DS在脂质水平和炎症标志物方面的降低幅度更大,很可能是因为这种方法允许过滤更大体积的血浆。《临床血液净化杂志》31:359 - 367,2016年。© 2015威利期刊公司