Oude Ophuis C M C, van Akkooi A C J, Hoekstra H J, Bonenkamp J J, van Wissen J, Niebling M G, de Wilt J H W, van der Hiel B, van de Wiel B, Koljenović S, Grünhagen D J, Verhoef C
Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S1172-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4602-4. Epub 2015 May 27.
Patients with palpable melanoma groin metastases have a poor prognosis. There is debate whether a combined superficial and deep groin dissection (CGD) is necessary or if superficial groin dissection (SGD) alone is sufficient.
The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for deep pelvic nodal involvement in a retrospective, multicenter cohort of palpable groin melanoma metastases. This could aid in the development of an algorithm for selective surgery in the future.
This study related to 209 therapeutic CGDs from four tertiary centers in The Netherlands (1992-2013), selected based on complete preoperative imaging and pathology reports. Analyzed risk factors included baseline and primary tumor characteristics, total and positive number of inguinal nodes, inguinal lymph node ratio (LNR) and positive deep pelvic nodes on imaging (computed tomography [CT] ± positron emission tomography [PET], or PET - low-dose CT).
Median age was 57 years, 54 % of patients were female, and median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11-46 months). Median Breslow thickness was 2.10 mm (IQR 1.40-3.40 mm), and 26 % of all primary melanomas were ulcerated. Positive deep pelvic nodes occurred in 35 % of CGDs. Significantly fewer inguinal nodes were positive in case of negative deep pelvic nodes (median 1 [IQR 1-2] vs. 3 [IQR 1-4] for positive deep pelvic nodes; p < 0.001), and LNR was significantly lower for negative versus positive deep pelvic nodes [median 0.15 (IQR 0.10-0.25) vs. 0.33 (IQR 0.14-0.54); p < 0.001]. A combination of negative imaging, low LNR, low number of positive inguinal nodes, and no extracapsular extension (ECE) could accurately predict the absence of pelvic nodal involvement in 84 % of patients.
Patients with negative imaging, few positive inguinal nodes, no ECE, and low LNR have a low risk of positive deep pelvic nodes and may safely undergo SGD alone.
可触及腹股沟黑色素瘤转移患者预后较差。对于是否有必要进行腹股沟浅深联合清扫术(CGD),还是仅进行腹股沟浅清扫术(SGD)就足够,存在争议。
本研究的目的是在一个回顾性多中心队列中分析可触及腹股沟黑色素瘤转移患者盆腔深部淋巴结受累的危险因素。这有助于未来制定选择性手术的算法。
本研究涉及荷兰四个三级中心(1992 - 2013年)的209例治疗性CGD,根据完整的术前影像学和病理报告进行选择。分析的危险因素包括基线和原发肿瘤特征、腹股沟淋巴结总数和阳性数、腹股沟淋巴结比率(LNR)以及影像学检查(计算机断层扫描[CT]±正电子发射断层扫描[PET],或PET - 低剂量CT)显示的盆腔深部阳性淋巴结。
中位年龄为57岁,54%的患者为女性,中位随访时间为21个月(四分位间距[IQR]为11 - 46个月)。中位Breslow厚度为2.10 mm(IQR为1.40 - 3.40 mm),所有原发性黑色素瘤中有26%发生溃疡。35%的CGD出现盆腔深部阳性淋巴结。盆腔深部淋巴结阴性时,腹股沟阳性淋巴结明显较少(盆腔深部阳性淋巴结时中位数为1[IQR为1 - 2],而盆腔深部阳性淋巴结时为3[IQR为1 - 4];p < 0.001),盆腔深部淋巴结阴性与阳性相比,LNR明显更低[中位数0.15(IQR为0.10 - 0.25)对0.33(IQR为0.14 - 0.54);p < 0.001]。阴性影像学、低LNR、阳性腹股沟淋巴结数量少和无包膜外侵犯(ECE)的组合可准确预测84%的患者无盆腔淋巴结受累。
影像学阴性、阳性腹股沟淋巴结少、无ECE且LNR低的患者盆腔深部阳性淋巴结风险低,可能仅行SGD即可安全治疗。