Cravener Terri L, Schlechter Haley, Loeb Katharine L, Radnitz Cynthia, Schwartz Marlene, Zucker Nancy, Finkelstein Stacey, Wang Y Claire, Rolls Barbara J, Keller Kathleen L
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Nov;115(11):1798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 May 23.
Behavioral economics and psychology have been applied to altering food choice, but most studies have not measured food intake under free-living conditions.
To test the effects of a strategy that pairs positive stimuli (ie, stickers and cartoon packaging) with vegetables and presents them as the default snack.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with children who reported consumption of fewer than two servings of vegetables daily. Children (aged 3 to 5 years) in both control (n=12) and treatment (n=12) groups received a week's supply of plainly packaged (ie, generic) vegetables, presented by parents as a free choice with an alternative snack (granola bar), during baseline (Week 1) and follow-up (Week 4). During Weeks 2 and 3, the control group continued to receive generic packages of vegetables presented as a free choice, but the treatment group received vegetables packaged in containers with favorite cartoon characters and stickers inside, presented by parents as the default choice. Children in the treatment group were allowed to opt out of the vegetables and request the granola bar after an imposed 5-minute wait.
General Linear Model repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted to compare vegetable and granola bar intake between control and treatment groups across the 4-week study. Both within- and between-subjects models were tested.
A time×treatment interaction on vegetable intake was significant. The treatment group increased vegetable intake from baseline to Week 2 relative to control (P<0.01), but the effects were not sustained at Week 4 when the treatment was removed. Granola bar intake decreased in the treatment group at Week 2 (P≤0.001) and Week 3 (P≤0.005) relative to baseline.
Parents were able to administer feeding practices derived from behavioral economics and psychology in the home to increase children's vegetable intake and decrease intake of a high-energy-density snack. Additional studies are needed to test the long-term sustainability of these practices.
行为经济学和心理学已被应用于改变食物选择,但大多数研究并未在自由生活条件下测量食物摄入量。
测试一种将积极刺激(即贴纸和卡通包装)与蔬菜配对并将其作为默认零食呈现的策略的效果。
对每天报告蔬菜摄入量少于两份的儿童进行了一项随机对照试验。对照组(n = 12)和治疗组(n = 12)的儿童(3至5岁)在基线期(第1周)和随访期(第4周)均收到一周量的普通包装(即无品牌)蔬菜,由父母作为与另一种零食(格兰诺拉燕麦棒)的自由选择提供。在第2周和第3周期间,对照组继续收到作为自由选择的普通包装蔬菜,但治疗组收到装在带有喜欢的卡通人物和贴纸的容器中的蔬菜,由父母作为默认选择提供。治疗组的儿童在强制等待5分钟后可以选择不吃蔬菜而要求吃格兰诺拉燕麦棒。
进行一般线性模型重复测量方差分析,以比较4周研究期间对照组和治疗组之间蔬菜和格兰诺拉燕麦棒的摄入量。对受试者内和受试者间模型均进行了测试。
蔬菜摄入量上的时间×治疗交互作用显著。与对照组相比,治疗组从基线到第2周蔬菜摄入量增加(P<0.01),但在第4周去除治疗后效果未持续。与基线相比,治疗组在第2周(P≤0.001)和第3周(P≤0.005)格兰诺拉燕麦棒摄入量减少。
父母能够在家中实施源自行为经济学和心理学的喂养方法,以增加儿童的蔬菜摄入量并减少高能量密度零食的摄入量。需要进一步的研究来测试这些方法的长期可持续性。