Hapairai Limb K, Plichart Catherine, Naseri Take, Silva Ualesi, Tesimale Lameko, Pemita Paulo, Bossin Hervé C, Burkot Thomas R, Ritchie Scott A, Graves Patricia M, Melrose Wayne, Joseph Hayley
Institut Louis Malardé, Papeete, French Polynesia.
Ministry of Health, Apia, Samoa.
Parasit Vectors. 2015 May 28;8:287. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0886-2.
Elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in Samoa continues to be challenging despite multiple annual mass drug campaigns aimed at stopping transmission by reducing the prevalence and density of microfilaraemia. The persistence of transmission may be partly related to the highly efficient Aedes vectors. The assessment of pathogen transmission by mosquito vectors and of vector control relies on the ability to capture mosquitoes efficiently. The aims of this study are to compare trapping methods to capture LF-infected mosquitoes and determine the role in transmission of the species of Aedes mosquitoes in the area.
Fasitoo-Tai village was the chosen site because of persistent transmission despite annual mass drug administration. Sampling methods included BioGents Sentinel (BGS) trap, human-baited collections (HBC) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) trap. BGS and CDC traps were baited with BG-lure, CO2, and/or octenol. Individual trap locations were geo-located and efficiency of sampling methods was evaluated using a randomized Latin-square design in two locations. Number of mosquitoes collected (male and female), as well as species for each trapping method were determined. Additionally, Ae. polynesiensis and Ae. (Finlaya) spp. females were pooled by trap method and analysed for filarial DNA. Infection prevalence was estimated using the PoolScreen software.
The BGS trap with any type of bait collected more mosquitoes compared to both the CDC trap and the HBC. The BGS trap baited with BG-lure collected more mosquitoes than with CO2 and octenol. There were no significant differences between trapping methods in terms of proportions of infected females collected. The prevalence of filarial infection in Ae. polynesiensis and Ae. (Finlaya) spp. was estimated at 4.7% and 0.67% respectively.
This study supports the use of the BGS trap for research on and surveillance of the mosquito vectors of LF in Samoa. The BGS trap is a suitable and safer alternative to HBC for sampling Ae. polynesiensis and Ae. (Finlaya) spp., which continue to be the predominant vectors of LF. Of concern was the high prevalence of LF in mosquitoes despite a recent mass drug administration programme. This highlights the urgency for updated policies concerning filariasis elimination in Samoa.
尽管萨摩亚每年开展多次大规模药物防治运动,旨在通过降低微丝蚴血症的患病率和密度来阻断传播,但消除淋巴丝虫病(LF)仍然具有挑战性。传播持续存在可能部分与高效的伊蚊媒介有关。评估蚊媒病原体传播和媒介控制依赖于有效捕获蚊子的能力。本研究的目的是比较捕获感染 LF 的蚊子的诱捕方法,并确定该地区伊蚊种类在传播中的作用。
由于尽管每年进行大规模药物给药但传播仍持续存在,法西托奥 - 泰村被选为研究地点。采样方法包括生物诱蚊监测器(BGS)诱捕器、人饵诱捕(HBC)和疾病控制中心(CDC)诱捕器。BGS 和 CDC 诱捕器用 BG 引诱剂、二氧化碳和/或辛烯醇作诱饵。对每个诱捕地点进行地理定位,并在两个地点使用随机拉丁方设计评估采样方法的效率。确定收集到的蚊子数量(雄性和雌性)以及每种诱捕方法捕获的蚊子种类。此外,将波利尼西亚伊蚊和(芬氏伊蚊)属的雌性蚊子按诱捕方法汇集,并分析丝虫 DNA。使用 PoolScreen 软件估计感染率。
与 CDC 诱捕器和 HBC 相比,使用任何类型诱饵的 BGS 诱捕器收集到的蚊子更多。用 BG 引诱剂作诱饵的 BGS 诱捕器收集到的蚊子比用二氧化碳和辛烯醇的更多。就收集到的感染雌性蚊子比例而言,诱捕方法之间没有显著差异。波利尼西亚伊蚊和(芬氏伊蚊)属的丝虫感染率分别估计为 4.7%和 0.67%。
本研究支持在萨摩亚将 BGS 诱捕器用于 LF 蚊媒的研究和监测。对于采样波利尼西亚伊蚊和(芬氏伊蚊)属,BGS 诱捕器是 HBC 的一种合适且更安全的替代方法,这两种蚊子仍然是 LF 的主要传播媒介。令人担忧的是,尽管最近实施了大规模药物防治计划,但蚊子中 LF 的患病率仍然很高。这凸显了萨摩亚更新丝虫病消除政策的紧迫性。