Suppr超能文献

运用Q方法探索对终末期肾病以患者为中心的护理而言重要事项的观点。

Exploring views on what is important for patient-centred care in end-stage renal disease using Q methodology.

作者信息

Cramm Jane M, Leensvaart Laszlo, Berghout Mathilde, van Exel Job

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2015 May 28;16:74. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0071-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore views on what is considered important for Patient-Centred Care (PCC) among patients and the healthcare professionals treating them in a haemodialysis department.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted among 14 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving dialysis and 12 healthcare professionals (i.e. 2 doctors, 4 staff members, and 6 nurses) working at a haemodialysis department. Participants were asked to rank-order 35 statements representing eight dimensions of PCC previously discussed in the literature. Views on PCC, and communalities and differences between them, were explored using by-person factor analysis.

RESULTS

Four views on what is important for PCC in end-stage renal disease were identified. In viewpoint 1, listening to patients and taking account of their preferences in treatment decisions is considered central to PCC. In viewpoint 2, providing comprehensible information and education to patients so that they can take charge of their own care is considered important. In viewpoint 3, several aspects related to the atmosphere at the department were put forward as important for PCC. In viewpoint 4, having a professional or acquaintance that acts as care coordinator, making treatment decisions with or for them, was considered particularly beneficial. All views agreed about the relative importance of certain PCC dimensions; the patient preferences and information and education dimensions were generally considered most important, while the family and friends and the access to care dimensions were considered least important.

CONCLUSIONS

The four views on PCC among patients in a haemodialysis department and the professionals treating them suggest that there is no one size fits all strategy for providing PCC to patients with end-stage renal disease. Some patients may benefit from educational interventions to improve their self-management skills and place them in charge of their own care, whereas other patients may benefit more from the availability of a care coordinator to make decisions for them, or with them. Furthermore, our results suggest that not all eight dimensions of PCC need to be given equal consideration in the care for patients with end-stage renal disease in order to improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨患者及血液透析科治疗他们的医护人员对于以患者为中心的护理(PCC)中重要因素的看法。

方法

对14名接受透析的终末期肾病患者以及在血液透析科工作的12名医护人员(即2名医生、4名工作人员和6名护士)进行了访谈。参与者被要求对代表先前文献中讨论过的PCC八个维度的35条陈述进行排序。使用个人因素分析探讨了对PCC的看法以及他们之间的共性和差异。

结果

确定了对于终末期肾病PCC重要因素的四种看法。在观点1中,倾听患者意见并在治疗决策中考虑他们的偏好被认为是PCC的核心。在观点2中,向患者提供可理解的信息和教育,使他们能够自主管理自己的护理被认为很重要。在观点3中,提出了与科室氛围相关的几个方面对PCC很重要。在观点4中,有一名专业人员或熟人担任护理协调员,为他们或与他们一起做出治疗决策被认为特别有益。所有观点都认同某些PCC维度的相对重要性;患者偏好以及信息和教育维度通常被认为是最重要的,而家人和朋友以及获得护理维度被认为是最不重要的。

结论

血液透析科患者及治疗他们的专业人员对PCC的四种看法表明,为终末期肾病患者提供PCC没有一刀切的策略。一些患者可能受益于教育干预措施,以提高他们的自我管理技能并让他们自主管理自己的护理,而其他患者可能从有护理协调员为他们或与他们一起做出决策中受益更多。此外,我们的结果表明,为了改善患者预后,在终末期肾病患者护理中并非需要对PCC的所有八个维度给予同等考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894d/4446837/3974ef2bb289/12882_2015_71_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验