Siddig Ahmed A, Ellison Aaron M, Jackson Scott
Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst , Amherst, MA , USA ; Harvard University, Harvard Forest , Petersham, MA , USA.
Harvard University, Harvard Forest , Petersham, MA , USA.
PeerJ. 2015 May 14;3:e952. doi: 10.7717/peerj.952. eCollection 2015.
Herpetologists and conservation biologists frequently use convenient and cost-effective, but less accurate, abundance indices (e.g., number of individuals collected under artificial cover boards or during natural objects surveys) in lieu of more accurate, but costly and destructive, population size estimators to detect and monitor size, state, and trends of amphibian populations. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to each approach, reliable use of abundance indices requires that they be calibrated with accurate population estimators. Such calibrations, however, are rare. The red back salamander, Plethodon cinereus, is an ecologically useful indicator species of forest dynamics, and accurate calibration of indices of salamander abundance could increase the reliability of abundance indices used in monitoring programs. We calibrated abundance indices derived from surveys of P. cinereus under artificial cover boards or natural objects with a more accurate estimator of their population size in a New England forest. Average densities/m(2) and capture probabilities of P. cinereus under natural objects or cover boards in independent, replicate sites at the Harvard Forest (Petersham, Massachusetts, USA) were similar in stands dominated by Tsuga canadensis (eastern hemlock) and deciduous hardwood species (predominantly Quercus rubra [red oak] and Acer rubrum [red maple]). The abundance index based on salamanders surveyed under natural objects was significantly associated with density estimates of P. cinereus derived from depletion (removal) surveys, but underestimated true density by 50%. In contrast, the abundance index based on cover-board surveys overestimated true density by a factor of 8 and the association between the cover-board index and the density estimates was not statistically significant. We conclude that when calibrated and used appropriately, some abundance indices may provide cost-effective and reliable measures of P. cinereus abundance that could be used in conservation assessments and long-term monitoring at Harvard Forest and other northeastern USA forests.
两栖动物学家和保护生物学家经常使用方便且经济高效但不太准确的丰度指数(例如,在人工遮盖板下或自然物体调查期间收集的个体数量),以替代更准确但成本高昂且具破坏性的种群规模估计方法,来检测和监测两栖动物种群的规模、状态及趋势。尽管每种方法都有优缺点,但要可靠地使用丰度指数,就需要用准确的种群估计方法对其进行校准。然而,这种校准很少见。红背蝾螈(Plethodon cinereus)是森林动态变化中具有生态指示作用的物种,对蝾螈丰度指数进行准确校准可以提高监测项目中所使用的丰度指数的可靠性。我们在新英格兰的一片森林中,用一种更准确的种群规模估计方法,对通过人工遮盖板或自然物体调查得出的红背蝾螈丰度指数进行了校准。在美国马萨诸塞州彼得舍姆的哈佛森林中,独立重复样地内,在以加拿大铁杉(东部铁杉)和落叶硬木树种(主要是红栎[红橡树]和红花槭[红枫])为主的林分中,自然物体下或遮盖板下红背蝾螈的平均密度/平方米及捕获概率相似。基于在自然物体下调查到的蝾螈得出的丰度指数,与通过捕获量下降(移除)调查得出的红背蝾螈密度估计值显著相关,但低估了真实密度的50%。相比之下,基于遮盖板调查的丰度指数高估了真实密度8倍,且遮盖板指数与密度估计值之间的关联无统计学意义。我们得出结论,经过适当校准并合理使用时,一些丰度指数可能会提供具有成本效益且可靠的红背蝾螈丰度测量方法,可用于哈佛森林及美国东北部其他森林的保护评估和长期监测。