Lukaszewicz M, Davis R, Bertrand J K, Misztal I, Tsuruta S
J Anim Sci. 2015 Apr;93(4):1490-3. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8285.
The purpose of this study was to estimate correlations between purebred and F1 crossbred performance to verify the appropriateness of current models used in multibreed selection. Records on birth weight (WB) and weaning weight (WW) from purebred Limousins (LIM) and Limousin × Angus progeny (F1) were used to estimate genetic parameters using a multiple-trait (purebred and F1 weights were different traits) approach. For WB, there were 148,647 records for LIM and 17,981 for F1, and for WW, there were 81,585 records for LIM and 21,778 for F1. The fixed effect in models for LIM and F1 animals was contemporary group. Random effects for LIM animals were direct genetic, maternal genetic, and maternal permanent environment effects. Random effects for F1 were sire and dam. The pedigree for Angus dams used for crossing was unavailable and therefore these dams were assumed unrelated. The direct h2 estimates (SE) for purebred animals were 0.41 (0.05) and 0.24 (0.02) for WB and WW, respectively. For F1, the same estimates were 0.22 (0.09) and 0.32 (0.05). Genetic correlations estimates between purebreds and crossbreds were 0.84 (0.07) and 0.64 (0.18) for WB and WW, respectively. The genetic correlation for WW estimated in this study suggests that F1 and purebred information for this trait should not be treated, genetically, as the same trait due to different genetic effects molding it. However, the genetic correlation for WB was much higher, indicating that this trait in purebreds and F1 is essentially the same trait.
本研究的目的是估计纯种和F1杂种性能之间的相关性,以验证当前多品种选择模型的适用性。利用纯种利木赞牛(LIM)和利木赞×安格斯后代(F1)的出生体重(WB)和断奶体重(WW)记录,采用多性状(纯种和F1体重为不同性状)方法估计遗传参数。对于WB,LIM有148,647条记录,F1有17,981条记录;对于WW,LIM有81,585条记录,F1有21,778条记录。LIM和F1动物模型中的固定效应是同期组。LIM动物的随机效应是直接遗传、母体遗传和母体永久环境效应。F1的随机效应是父本和母本。用于杂交的安格斯母牛的系谱不可用,因此假设这些母牛无亲缘关系。纯种动物的直接遗传力估计值(标准误)对于WB和WW分别为0.41(0.05)和0.24(0.02)。对于F1,相同的估计值分别为0.22(0.09)和0.32(0.05)。纯种和杂种之间的遗传相关性估计值对于WB和WW分别为0.84(0.07)和0.64(0.18)。本研究中估计的WW的遗传相关性表明,由于塑造该性状的遗传效应不同,从遗传角度看,F1和该性状的纯种信息不应被视为同一性状。然而,WB的遗传相关性要高得多,表明纯种和F1中的该性状本质上是同一性状。