Lim Seung-Jae, Jang Seung-Pil, Kim Dong-Wook, Moon Young-Wan, Park Youn-Soo
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3781-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4374-y.
Modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have become attractive alternatives to conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a result of their low wear and minimal particle production. However, 28-mm heads in ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples have been associated with ceramic fracture. To address these issues, 32-mm and larger ceramic heads with a titanium-alloy sleeve have been introduced, although limited data are available on their durability and clinical outcomes.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) the survivorship of the primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve at a minimum followup of 5 years; (2) Harris hip scores; (3) the incidence of ceramic fracture and noisy hip; and (4) the proportion of hips showing radiographic evidence of osteolysis.
From November 2005 to August 2009, we performed 301 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve in 270 patients. Of these, 12 patients (12 hips [4%]) died from problems unrelated to surgery and 13 patients (15 hips [5%]) were lost during followup before a minimum of 5 years had been reached, leaving 245 patients who had 274 THAs with a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 6.5 years; range, 5-9 years) in this retrospective analysis. During the study period, 30% (301 of 997 hips) were performed with this articulation based on the operating surgeon's discretion. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 55 years (range, 16-82 years). All operations were performed at a single center. All of the ceramic implants were hot isostatic-pressed, laser-marked, proof-tested third-generation alumina. We determined the implant survival, Harris hip scores, incidence of ceramic fracture or noisy hips (based on a questionnaire), and presence of osteolysis.
The survival rate of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in primary THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve was 98% (95% confidence interval, 96%-100%) at 9 years. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 47 points preoperatively to 93 points at last followup. One ceramic head fractured at 6 years postoperatively. No ceramic liners fractured. Audible hip clicking and squeaking were identified in four hips and one hip, respectively. Osteolysis was detected in three hips, but none had symptoms.
Primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve has a survivorship of 98% at 9-year followup. Nevertheless, surgeons should be aware of the potential risks of ceramic fracture, noise, and osteolysis associated with the use of a ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve.
Level IV, therapeutic study.
现代陶瓷对陶瓷轴承因其低磨损和极少的颗粒产生,已成为全髋关节置换术(THA)中传统聚乙烯的有吸引力的替代方案。然而,陶瓷对陶瓷轴承组合中的28毫米股骨头与陶瓷骨折有关。为解决这些问题,已引入了带有钛合金套筒的32毫米及更大尺寸的陶瓷股骨头,尽管关于其耐久性和临床结果的数据有限。
问题/目的:我们确定了(1)使用带有钛合金套筒的32毫米陶瓷股骨头的初次陶瓷对陶瓷THA在至少5年随访时的生存率;(2)Harris髋关节评分;(3)陶瓷骨折和髋关节异响的发生率;(4)显示有骨溶解影像学证据的髋关节比例。
从2005年11月至2009年8月,我们对270例患者进行了301例使用带有钛合金套筒的32毫米陶瓷股骨头的陶瓷对陶瓷THA。其中,12例患者(12髋[4%])死于与手术无关的问题,13例患者(15髋[5%])在随访期间失访,未达到至少5年的随访时间,在这项回顾性分析中,剩下245例患者有274例THA,至少随访5年(平均6.5年;范围5 - 9年)。在研究期间,基于手术医生的判断,997髋中有30%(301髋)采用了这种关节置换方式。手术时患者的平均年龄为55岁(范围16 - 82岁)。所有手术均在单一中心进行。所有陶瓷植入物均为热等静压、激光标记、经过验证测试的第三代氧化铝。我们确定了植入物生存率、Harris髋关节评分、陶瓷骨折或髋关节异响的发生率(基于问卷)以及骨溶解的存在情况。
使用带有钛合金套筒的32毫米陶瓷股骨头的初次THA中,陶瓷对陶瓷轴承在9年时的生存率为98%(95%置信区间,96% - 100%)。Harris髋关节评分从术前平均47分提高到最后随访时的93分。1个陶瓷股骨头在术后6年发生骨折。没有陶瓷内衬骨折。分别在4髋和1髋中发现可闻及的髋关节弹响和摩擦音。在3髋中检测到骨溶解,但均无症状。
使用带有钛合金套筒的32毫米陶瓷股骨头的初次陶瓷对陶瓷THA在9年随访时的生存率为98%。尽管如此,外科医生应意识到与使用带有钛合金套筒的陶瓷股骨头相关的陶瓷骨折、异响和骨溶解的潜在风险。
IV级,治疗性研究。