Shah Punit J, Vakil Niyati, Kabakov Anna
Punit J. Shah, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacist, Alexian Brokers Health System, Elk Grove Village, IL; at the time of writing he was Antimicrobial Utilization Review Pharmacist, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Niyati Vakil, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Antimicrobial Utilization Review Pharmacist, Pharmacy Services, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Anna Kabakov, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, and Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Internal Medicine, Presence Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, IL; at the time of writing she was Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Internal Medicine, Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, North Chicago, IL.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Jun 15;72(12):1013-9. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140359.
The use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) in the management of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is reviewed.
IVIG has a wide range of uses in clinical practice, including STSS and CDI. It is an attractive option for these two infections because both infections are toxin mediated, and IVIG may contain antibodies that neutralize these toxins. For STSS and CDI, IVIG is often considered for use in critically ill patients who are not responding to traditional therapies. Several encouraging case reports and retrospective chart reviews have been published, highlighting the potential benefit of IVIG in such patients. However, its definitive role remains unclear, mainly due to the lack of high-level evidence. Data supporting its use have been extrapolated from retrospective chart reviews and case reports in which profound heterogeneity in patient populations and treatment modalities exist. The use of IVIG must be weighed carefully because it is not a benign product. As with the use of IVIG for STSS, the role of IVIG for CDI is unclear. Nonetheless, IVIG may serve as a useful adjunct therapy for patients suffering from severe complicated CDI (shock, ileus, or megacolon) who do not respond to conventional treatment. Adverse reactions to IVIG are mild and transitory and occur during or immediately after drug infusion.
Although randomized, controlled trials supporting the use of IVIG for STSS and CDI are lacking, IVIG may be considered a last-line adjunct therapy in those patients for whom the clinical benefit outweighs the potential adverse effects of therapy.
综述静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)在链球菌中毒性休克综合征(STSS)和艰难梭菌感染(CDI)治疗中的应用。
IVIG在临床实践中有广泛用途,包括STSS和CDI。对于这两种感染,它是一个有吸引力的选择,因为这两种感染均由毒素介导,且IVIG可能含有中和这些毒素的抗体。对于STSS和CDI,IVIG通常用于对传统疗法无反应的重症患者。已发表了几篇令人鼓舞的病例报告和回顾性图表综述,突出了IVIG在此类患者中的潜在益处。然而,其确切作用仍不明确,主要是由于缺乏高级别证据。支持其使用的数据是从回顾性图表综述和病例报告中推断出来的,这些研究中患者群体和治疗方式存在很大异质性。必须谨慎权衡IVIG的使用,因为它并非无害产品。与IVIG用于STSS一样,IVIG在CDI中的作用尚不清楚。尽管如此,对于患有严重复杂性CDI(休克、肠梗阻或巨结肠)且对传统治疗无反应的患者,IVIG可能是一种有用的辅助治疗方法。IVIG的不良反应轻微且短暂,发生在药物输注期间或输注后立即出现。
尽管缺乏支持IVIG用于STSS和CDI的随机对照试验,但对于临床益处超过治疗潜在不良反应的患者,可考虑将IVIG作为一线辅助治疗。