Shalish Wissam, Anna Guilherme Mendes Sant'
Division of Neonatology, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.
Paediatr Child Health. 2015 May;20(4):e13-9. doi: 10.1093/pch/20.4.e13.
To identify the proportion of Canadian neonatal intensive care units with existing mechanical ventilation protocols and to determine the characteristics and respiratory care practices of units that have adopted such protocols.
A structured survey including 36 questions about mechanical ventilation protocols and respiratory care practices was mailed to the medical directors of all tertiary care neonatal units in Canada and circulated between December 2012 and March 2013.
Twenty-four of 32 units responded to the survey (75%). Of the respondents, 91% were medical directors and 71% worked in university hospitals. Nine units (38%) had at least one type of mechanical ventilation protocol, most commonly for the acute and weaning phases. Units with pre-existing protocols were more commonly university-affiliated and had higher ratios of ventilated patients to physicians or respiratory therapists, although this did not reach statistical significance. The presence of a mechanical ventilation protocol was highly correlated with the coexistence of a protocol for noninvasive ventilation (P<0.001, OR 4.5 [95% CI 1.3 to 15.3]). There were overall wide variations in ventilation practices across units. However, units with mechanical ventilation protocols were significantly more likely to extubate neonates from the assist control mode (P=0.039, OR 8.25 [95% CI 1.2 to 59]).
Despite the lack of compelling evidence to support their use in neonates, a considerable number of Canadian neonatal intensive care units have adopted mechanical ventilation protocols. More research is needed to better understand their role in reducing unnecessary variations in practice and improving short- and long-term outcomes.
确定加拿大现有机械通气方案的新生儿重症监护病房的比例,并确定采用此类方案的病房的特征和呼吸护理实践。
2012年12月至2013年3月期间,向加拿大所有三级护理新生儿病房的医疗主任邮寄了一份包含36个关于机械通气方案和呼吸护理实践问题的结构化调查问卷。
32个病房中有24个回复了调查(75%)。在受访者中,91%是医疗主任,71%在大学医院工作。9个病房(38%)至少有一种类型的机械通气方案,最常见于急性和撤机阶段。已有方案的病房更常见于大学附属医院,且通气患者与医生或呼吸治疗师的比例更高,尽管这未达到统计学意义。机械通气方案的存在与无创通气方案的共存高度相关(P<0.001,OR 4.5[95%CI 1.3至15.3])。各病房的通气实践总体差异很大。然而,有机械通气方案的病房从辅助控制模式拔管新生儿的可能性显著更高(P=0.039,OR 8.25[95%CI 1.2至59])。
尽管缺乏支持在新生儿中使用机械通气方案的有力证据,但相当数量的加拿大新生儿重症监护病房已采用了此类方案。需要更多研究以更好地了解其在减少实践中不必要的差异以及改善短期和长期结局方面的作用。