• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让医学生课程评估具有意义:强化课程审查方案的实施

Making medical student course evaluations meaningful: implementation of an intensive course review protocol.

作者信息

Fleming Patrick, Heath Olga, Goodridge Alan, Curran Vernon

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.

Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jun 4;15:99. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0387-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-015-0387-1
PMID:26041364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4460774/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ongoing course evaluation is a key component of quality improvement in higher education. The complexities associated with delivering high quality medical education programs involving multiple lecturers can make course and instructor evaluation challenging. We describe the implementation and evaluation of an "intensive course review protocol" in an undergraduate medical program

METHODS

We examined pre-clerkship courses from 2006 to 2011 - prior to and following protocol implementation. Our non-parametric analysis included Mann-Whitney U tests to compare the 2006/07 and 2010/11 academic years.

RESULTS

We included 30 courses in our analysis. In the 2006/07 academic year, 13/30 courses (43.3 %) did not meet the minimum benchmark and were put under intensive review. By 2010/11, only 3/30 courses (10.0 %) were still below the minimum benchmark. Compared to 2006/07, courses ratings in the 2010/11 year were significantly higher (p = 0.004). However, during the study period mean response rates fell from 76.5 % in 2006/07 to 49.7 % in 2010/11.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest an intensive course review protocol can have a significant impact on pre-clerkship course ratings in an undergraduate medical program. Reductions in survey response rates represent an ongoing challenge in the interpretation of student feedback.

摘要

背景

持续的课程评估是高等教育质量提升的关键组成部分。提供涉及多名讲师的高质量医学教育项目所带来的复杂性,可能会使课程和教师评估具有挑战性。我们描述了本科医学项目中“强化课程审查方案”的实施与评估情况。

方法

我们研究了2006年至2011年临床实习前课程——方案实施前后的情况。我们的非参数分析包括使用曼-惠特尼U检验来比较2006/07学年和2010/11学年。

结果

我们的分析纳入了30门课程。在2006/07学年,30门课程中有13门(43.3%)未达到最低基准并被进行强化审查。到2010/11年,只有30门课程中的3门(10.0%)仍低于最低基准。与2006/07年相比,2010/11年课程评分显著更高(p = 0.004)。然而,在研究期间,平均回复率从2006/07年的76.5%降至2010/11年的49.7%。

结论

这些结果表明,强化课程审查方案可对本科医学项目临床实习前课程评分产生重大影响。调查回复率的降低是学生反馈解读中持续存在的挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e99/4460774/3fdd216cae04/12909_2015_387_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e99/4460774/5468329be3cc/12909_2015_387_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e99/4460774/3fdd216cae04/12909_2015_387_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e99/4460774/5468329be3cc/12909_2015_387_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e99/4460774/3fdd216cae04/12909_2015_387_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Making medical student course evaluations meaningful: implementation of an intensive course review protocol.让医学生课程评估具有意义:强化课程审查方案的实施
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jun 4;15:99. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0387-1.
2
Changing medical students' perception of the evaluation culture: Is it possible?改变医学生对评估文化的认知:这有可能吗?
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Feb 15;13:8. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.8. eCollection 2016.
3
The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.书面标准化反馈对外科讲座结构和质量的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0806-y.
4
Student evaluation team focus groups increase students' satisfaction with the overall course evaluation process.学生评估团队焦点小组提高了学生对整体课程评估过程的满意度。
Med Educ. 2017 Feb;51(2):215-227. doi: 10.1111/medu.13104. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
A vascular disease educational program in the preclinical years of medical school increases student interest in vascular disease.医学院临床前阶段的血管疾病教育计划增加了学生对血管疾病的兴趣。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):775-80; discussion 780-1, 781.e1-781.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.063. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
6
Integration of geriatrics into a spiral undergraduate medical curriculum in Pakistan: evaluation and feedback of third-year medical students.巴基斯坦将老年医学纳入本科医学螺旋式课程:三年级医学生的评估与反馈
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011 Dec;24(3):622. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
7
Paediatric resuscitation training--do medical students believe it should be a mandatory component of the curriculum?儿科复苏培训——医学生是否认为这应该是课程的必修组成部分?
Resuscitation. 2011 May;82(5):584-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
8
Individual class evaluation and effective teaching characteristics in integrated curricula.综合课程中的个体课程评估与有效教学特点。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1097-7.
9
Assessing geriatrics in undergraduate medical education: two different approaches.评估本科医学教育中的老年医学:两种不同方法。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2004;24(3):1-8. doi: 10.1300/j021v24n03_01.
10
Outcomes of different clerkship models: longitudinal integrated, hybrid, and block.不同实习模式的结果:纵向综合、混合和块状。
Acad Med. 2013 Jan;88(1):35-43. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318276ca9b.

引用本文的文献

1
Using cognitive load theory to evaluate and improve preparatory materials and study time for the flipped classroom.运用认知负荷理论评估和改进翻转课堂的预备材料和学习时间。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 17;23(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04325-x.
2
Rapid Feedback: Assessing Pre-clinical Teaching in the Era of Online Learning.快速反馈:评估在线学习时代的临床前教学
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Jun 15;32(4):819-826. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01573-2. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Influence of Student Feedback on the Quality of Teaching among Clinical Teachers in Bahrain.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing evaluation in an undergraduate medical education program.加强本科医学教育项目中的评估。
Acad Med. 2008 Aug;83(8):787-93. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31817eb8ab.
2
Comparison of opinions and profiles of late or non-responding medical students with initial responders to a course evaluation questionnaire.
Med Teach. 2005 Nov;27(7):644-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590500136287.
3
A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges.临床教学评估综述:新视角与挑战
巴林临床教师中,学生反馈对教学质量的影响。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Dec 13;30(1):253-262. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00892-1. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Student curriculum review team, 8 years later: Where we stand and opportunities for growth.学生课程评审团队,8年后:我们所处的位置与成长机遇
Med Teach. 2021 Mar;43(3):314-319. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1841891. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
5
Students' Evaluation of Teaching and Their Academic Achievement in a Higher Education Institution of Ecuador.厄瓜多尔一所高等教育机构中学生对教学的评价及其学业成绩
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 6;11:233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00233. eCollection 2020.
6
Use of portfolios in teaching communication skills and professionalism for Portuguese-speaking medical students.使用组合评估法来教授葡萄牙语医学专业学生的沟通技巧和专业精神。
Int J Med Educ. 2020 Feb 14;11:37-46. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5e2a.fa68.
7
A Review of Strategies for Designing, Administering, and Using Student Ratings of Instruction.教学设计、管理和使用学生教学评价策略综述。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Jun;83(5):7177. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7177.
Med Educ. 2000 Oct;34(10):862-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00754.x.
4
Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center.开发并测试一种用于衡量学术医疗中心临床教学效果的工具。
Acad Med. 2000 Feb;75(2):161-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00015.
5
Preclinical course-evaluation methods at U.S. and Canadian medical schools.美国和加拿大医学院校的临床前课程评估方法。
Acad Med. 1996 Apr;71(4):371-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199604000-00015.