Department of Internal Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital , Arnhem , Netherlands ; Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center , Amsterdam , Netherlands.
Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center , Amsterdam , Netherlands.
Front Public Health. 2015 May 19;3:139. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00139. eCollection 2015.
BACKGROUND: Adherence to combination anti-retroviral therapy for HIV infection is a primary determinant of treatment success, but is often suboptimal. Previous studies have suggested that electronic medication monitoring-informed counseling is among the most effective adherence intervention components. Our objective was to review available evidence about the effectiveness of monitoring-informed counseling and to aggregate findings into quantitative estimates of the effect of such intervention on medication adherence and virologic treatment outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed for papers reporting on randomized controlled trials comparing intervention groups receiving monitoring-informed counseling as one of the intervention components versus control groups not receiving such counseling for their effect on medication adherence and viral load concentrations. The standardized mean difference (SMD) in adherence and the odds ratio (OR) of undetectable HIV RNA in intervention versus control groups were the common effect sizes. Random-effect models with inverse variance weights were used to aggregate findings into pooled effect estimates with 95% confidence limits (CI). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included. Adherence was significantly higher in intervention groups than in control groups (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.71). Patients in intervention groups were significantly more likely to have undetectable HIV RNA concentrations than patients in control groups (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.12-1.63). However, in studies in which monitoring-informed counseling was the only intervention component, the difference in adherence and virologic response between intervention and control groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Electronic monitoring-informed counseling improved adherence and virologic response compared with control groups not receiving such counseling in studies in which it was one out of multiple intervention components, but not in studies where it was the only intervention component.
背景:抗逆转录病毒疗法治疗艾滋病病毒感染的依从性是治疗成功的主要决定因素,但往往并不理想。先前的研究表明,电子药物监测告知咨询是最有效的依从性干预措施之一。我们的目的是回顾现有关于监测告知咨询有效性的证据,并将研究结果汇总为定量估计,以了解这种干预措施对药物依从性和病毒学治疗结果的影响。
方法:我们在 PubMed 上搜索了报告比较干预组接受监测告知咨询作为干预措施之一与对照组未接受此类咨询对药物依从性和病毒载量浓度影响的随机对照试验的论文。干预组与对照组在依从性方面的标准化均数差(SMD)和干预组中无法检测到 HIV RNA 的比值比(OR)是常见的效果大小。采用具有逆方差权重的随机效应模型,将研究结果汇总为具有 95%置信区间(CI)的汇总效应估计值。
结果:共纳入 13 项研究。干预组的依从性明显高于对照组(SMD 0.51,95%CI 0.31-0.71)。与对照组相比,干预组患者的 HIV RNA 浓度更有可能无法检测到(OR 1.35,95%CI 1.12-1.63)。然而,在监测告知咨询是唯一干预措施的研究中,干预组和对照组在依从性和病毒学反应方面的差异没有统计学意义。
结论:与未接受此类咨询的对照组相比,在监测告知咨询是多种干预措施之一的研究中,电子监测告知咨询改善了依从性和病毒学反应,但在监测告知咨询是唯一干预措施的研究中,这种效果并不显著。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-10-26
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019-11-21
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-11-20
JAMA Intern Med. 2013-2-25
AIDS Behav. 2011-10
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010-2