From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (Y.Y., J.R.P.-P., M.K.N., Y.B.); Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (G.D.B., Y.B.); and AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden (S.N.).
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Aug;35(8):1805-14. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305655. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
In addition to P2Y12 receptor antagonism, ticagrelor inhibits adenosine cell uptake. Prior data show that 7-day pretreatment with ticagrelor limits infarct size. We explored the acute effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on infarct size and potential long-term effects on heart function.
Rats underwent 30-minute ischemia per 24-hour reperfusion. (1) Ticagrelor (10 or 30 mg/kg) or clopidogrel (12.5 mg/kg) was given via intraperitoneal injection 5 minutes before reperfusion. (2) Rats received ticagrelor acute (intraperitoneal; 30 mg/kg), chronic (oral; 300 mg/kg per day) for 4 weeks starting 1 day after reperfusion or the combination (acute+chronic). Another group received clopidogrel (intraperitoneal [12.5 mg/kg]+oral [62.5 mg/kg per day]) for 4 weeks. (1) Ticagrelor dose-dependently reduced infarct size, 10 mg/kg (31.5%±1.8%; P<0.001) and 30 mg/kg (21.4%±2.6%; P<0.001) versus control (45.3±1.7%), whereas clopidogrel had no effect (42.4%±2.6%). Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel, increased myocardial adenosine levels, increased phosphorylation of Akt, endothelial NO synthase, and extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2 4 hours after reperfusion and decreased apoptosis. (2) After 4 weeks, left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced in the vehicle-treated group (44.8%±3.5%) versus sham (77.6%±0.9%). All ticagrelor treatments improved left ventricular ejection fraction, acute (69.5%±1.6%), chronic (69.2%±1.0%), and acute+chronic (76.3%±1.2%), whereas clopidogrel had no effect (37.4%±3.7%). Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel, attenuated fibrosis and decreased collagen-III mRNA levels 4 weeks after ischemia/reperfusion. Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel, attenuated the increase in proinflammatory tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-18, and increased anti-inflammatory 15-epi-lipoxin-A4 levels.
Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel, administered just before reperfusion protects against reperfusion injury. This acute treatment or chronic ticagrelor for 4 weeks or their combination improved heart function, whereas clopidogrel, despite achieving a similar degree of platelet inhibition, had no effect.
除了 P2Y12 受体拮抗作用外,替格瑞洛还能抑制腺苷细胞摄取。先前的数据表明,替格瑞洛预处理 7 天可限制梗死面积。我们探讨了替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷对梗死面积的急性影响,以及对心脏功能的潜在长期影响。
大鼠每 24 小时经历 30 分钟缺血/再灌注。(1)替格瑞洛(10 或 30mg/kg)或氯吡格雷(12.5mg/kg)在再灌注前 5 分钟通过腹腔内注射给药。(2)大鼠在再灌注后第 1 天开始接受替格瑞洛急性(腹腔内;30mg/kg/天)、慢性(口服;300mg/kg/天)治疗 4 周,或联合用药(急性+慢性)。另一组接受氯吡格雷(腹腔内[12.5mg/kg]+口服[62.5mg/kg/天])治疗 4 周。(1)替格瑞洛剂量依赖性地减少梗死面积,10mg/kg(31.5%±1.8%;P<0.001)和 30mg/kg(21.4%±2.6%;P<0.001)与对照组(45.3%±1.7%)相比,而氯吡格雷则没有效果(42.4%±2.6%)。替格瑞洛,而不是氯吡格雷,在再灌注后 4 小时增加心肌腺苷水平,增加 Akt、内皮型一氧化氮合酶和细胞外信号调节激酶 1/2 的磷酸化,并减少细胞凋亡。(2)4 周后,与假手术组(77.6%±0.9%)相比,载体治疗组(44.8%±3.5%)的左心室射血分数降低。所有替格瑞洛治疗均改善左心室射血分数,急性(69.5%±1.6%)、慢性(69.2%±1.0%)和急性+慢性(76.3%±1.2%),而氯吡格雷则没有效果(37.4%±3.7%)。替格瑞洛,而不是氯吡格雷,减轻了缺血/再灌注 4 周后的纤维化并降低了胶原-III mRNA 水平。替格瑞洛,而不是氯吡格雷,减轻了促炎肿瘤坏死因子-α、白细胞介素-1β和白细胞介素-18 的增加,并增加了抗炎 15-epi-脂氧素-A4 水平。
替格瑞洛,而不是氯吡格雷,在再灌注前给药可防止再灌注损伤。这种急性治疗或替格瑞洛慢性治疗 4 周或两者联合治疗可改善心脏功能,而氯吡格雷尽管达到了相似的血小板抑制程度,但没有效果。