Suppr超能文献

第五跖骨骨折——是否需要常规随访?

Fifth metatarsal fractures - Is routine follow-up necessary?

作者信息

Ferguson K B, McGlynn J, Jenkins P, Madeley N J, Kumar C S, Rymaszewski L

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, Scotland G4 0SF, United Kingdom.

Department of Orthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, Scotland G4 0SF, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Injury. 2015 Aug;46(8):1664-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.041. Epub 2015 May 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fifth metatarsal fractures are common, and the outcome with conservative treatment is generally very satisfactory. Operative treatment is only used for selected injuries, particularly stress fractures. Traditionally these patients are routinely reviewed at a fracture clinic, mainly due to the perceived risk of non-union with a Jones' fracture. In 2011 we introduced a standardised protocol to promote weight bearing as pain allowed with an elasticated support or a removable boot. Patients were discharged with structured advice and a help-line number to access care if required, but no further face-to-face review was arranged. More complex cases were reviewed at a "virtual clinic." Our hypothesis was that the introduction of this standardised protocol would be safe, patient-centred and significantly reduce unnecessary outpatient clinic review.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We audited fracture clinic attendance and outcomes 1 year before and 1 year after the protocol was introduced in 2011. All radiographs taken at the Emergency Department (ED) presentation were reviewed and classified independently for validation.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2010, 279 patients who presented to the ED with fifth metatarsal fractures were referred to a fracture clinic. Of these 279 patients, 267 (96%) attended the fracture clinic, resulting in an overall total of 491 outpatient attendances. Three (1%) were treated operatively for delayed/non-union. From 2011 to 2012, 339 patients presented to the ED with fifth metatarsal fractures - only 67 (20%) were referred to a fracture clinic. 62 (18%) attended clinic appointments with 102 appointments in total. Five (1%) required operative intervention.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed no added clinical value for routine outpatient follow-up of fifth metatarsal fractures. Patients can be safely discharged and allowed to bear weight at the time of initial ED presentation if they are provided with appropriate information and ready access to experienced fracture clinic staff.

摘要

背景

第五跖骨骨折很常见,保守治疗的效果通常非常令人满意。手术治疗仅用于特定损伤,尤其是应力性骨折。传统上,这些患者会在骨折诊所定期复诊,主要是因为认为琼斯骨折有不愈合的风险。2011年,我们引入了一项标准化方案,在疼痛允许的情况下,使用弹性支撑物或可拆卸靴子促进负重。患者出院时会得到结构化建议和求助热线号码,以便在需要时获得护理,但不再安排进一步的面对面复诊。更复杂的病例在“虚拟诊所”进行复诊。我们的假设是,引入该标准化方案将是安全的、以患者为中心的,并能显著减少不必要的门诊复诊。

患者与方法

我们对2011年引入该方案前后1年的骨折诊所就诊情况和治疗结果进行了审核。对急诊科(ED)就诊时拍摄的所有X线片进行了复查,并独立分类以进行验证。

结果

2009年至2010年,279例因第五跖骨骨折到急诊科就诊的患者被转诊至骨折诊所。在这279例患者中,267例(96%)到骨折诊所就诊,导致门诊就诊总数达491次。3例(1%)因延迟愈合/不愈合接受了手术治疗。2011年至2012年,339例因第五跖骨骨折到急诊科就诊的患者中,只有67例(20%)被转诊至骨折诊所。62例(18%)前来门诊就诊,共预约了102次。5例(1%)需要手术干预。

结论

我们的研究表明,第五跖骨骨折常规门诊随访没有额外的临床价值。如果为患者提供适当信息并使其能够随时联系到经验丰富的骨折诊所工作人员,患者在急诊科初次就诊时即可安全出院并开始负重。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验