Suppr超能文献

荷兰单纯稳定损伤患者从急诊科直接出院的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of direct discharge from the emergency department of patients with simple stable injuries in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Geerdink Thijs H, Geerdink Niek J, van Dongen Johanna M, Haverlag Robert, Goslings J Carel, van Veen Ruben N

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Oct 26;6(1):e000763. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000763. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately one-third of musculoskeletal injuries are simple stable injuries (SSIs). Direct discharge (DD) from the emergency department (ED) of patients with SSIs reduces healthcare utilization, without compromising patient outcome and experience, when compared with "traditional" care with routine follow-up. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of DD compared with traditional care from a societal perspective.

METHODS

Societal costs, including healthcare, work absenteeism, and travel costs, were calculated for patients with an SSI, 6 months before (pre-DD cohort) and after implementation of DD (DD cohort). The pre-DD cohort was treated according to local protocols. The DD cohort was treated using orthoses, discharge leaflet, smartphone application, and telephone helpline, without scheduling routine follow-up. Effect measures included generic health-related quality of life (HR-QoL; EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire); disease-specific HR-QoL (functional outcome, different validated questionnaires, converted to 0-100 scale); treatment satisfaction (Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 1-10); and pain (VAS, 1-10). All data were assessed using a 3-month postinjury survey and electronic patient records. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated and uncertainty was assessed using bootstrapping techniques.

RESULTS

Before DD, 144 of 348 participants completed the survey versus 153 of 371 patients thereafter. There were no statistically significant differences between the pre-DD cohort and the DD cohort for generic HR-QoL (0.03; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.08), disease-specific HR-QoL (4.4; 95% CI -1.1 to 9.9), pain (0.08; 95% CI -0.37 to 0.52) and treatment satisfaction (-0.16; 95% CI -0.53 to 0.21). Total societal costs were lowest in the DD cohort (-€822; 95% CI -€1719 to -€67), including healthcare costs (-€168; 95% CI -€205 to -€131) and absenteeism costs (-€645; 95% CI -€1535 to €100). The probability of DD being cost-effective was 0.98 at a willingness-to-pay of €0 for all effect measures, remaining high with increasing willingness-to-pay for generic HR-QoL, disease-specific HR-QoL, and pain, and decreasing with increasing willingness-to-pay for treatment satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

DD from the ED of patients with SSI seems cost-effective from a societal perspective. Future studies should test generalizability in other healthcare systems and strengthen findings in larger injury-specific cohorts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

背景

约三分之一的肌肉骨骼损伤为简单稳定损伤(SSIs)。与采用常规随访的“传统”护理相比,急诊科(ED)对简单稳定损伤患者进行直接出院(DD)可减少医疗资源利用,且不影响患者的治疗效果和就医体验。本研究旨在从社会角度确定直接出院与传统护理相比的成本效益。

方法

计算了简单稳定损伤患者在实施直接出院前6个月(直接出院前队列)和实施直接出院后(直接出院队列)的社会成本,包括医疗保健、旷工和交通成本。直接出院前队列按照当地方案进行治疗。直接出院队列使用矫形器、出院传单、智能手机应用程序和电话热线进行治疗,不安排常规随访。效果指标包括一般健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL;欧洲五维健康量表);疾病特异性HR-QoL(功能结局,不同的经过验证的问卷,转换为0-100分制);治疗满意度(视觉模拟量表(VAS),1-10分);以及疼痛(VAS,1-10分)。所有数据均通过伤后3个月的调查和电子病历进行评估。计算增量成本效益比,并使用自抽样技术评估不确定性。

结果

在直接出院前,348名参与者中有144名完成了调查,而此后371名患者中有153名完成了调查。在一般HR-QoL(0.03;95%CI -0.01至0.08)、疾病特异性HR-QoL(4.4;95%CI -1.1至9.9)、疼痛(0.08;95%CI -0.37至0.52)和治疗满意度(-0.16;95%CI -0.53至0.21)方面,直接出院前队列和直接出院队列之间没有统计学上的显著差异。直接出院队列的社会总成本最低(-822欧元;95%CI -1719至-67欧元),包括医疗保健成本(-168欧元;95%CI -205至-131欧元)和旷工成本(-645欧元;95%CI -1535至100欧元)。对于所有效果指标,在支付意愿为0欧元时,直接出院具有成本效益的概率为0.98,随着对一般HR-QoL、疾病特异性HR-QoL和疼痛的支付意愿增加,该概率仍然很高,而随着对治疗满意度的支付意愿增加,该概率降低。

讨论

从社会角度来看,急诊科对简单稳定损伤患者进行直接出院似乎具有成本效益。未来的研究应测试在其他医疗系统中的可推广性,并在更大的特定损伤队列中加强研究结果。

证据水平

II级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ae1/8549675/c4cebad6291b/tsaco-2021-000763f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验