• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换翻修术中股骨骨水泥取出——一项体外研究,比较计算机辅助徒手导航下的骨水泥取出与传统骨水泥取出

Femoral cement extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty--an in vitro study comparing computer-assisted freehand-navigated cement removal to conventional cement extraction.

作者信息

Mumme Torsten, Friedrich Max Julian, Rode Henrik, Gravius Sascha, Andereya Stefan, Müller-Rath Ralf, de la Fuente Matias

出版信息

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2015 Dec;60(6):567-75. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-0041.

DOI:10.1515/bmt-2014-0041
PMID:26053005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revision surgery of cemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty is gaining more and more importance, but cement removal in revision hip arthroplasty may be technically challenging. Conventional manual cement removal can be time consuming and be associated with complications such as cortical perforation, fracture, or bone loss. The aim of this study was to investigate the practicability of computer-navigated cement removal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In an in vitro study, we examined the removal of the bone cement out of composite bones. To evaluate accuracy, the bones were scanned before and after cement removal with the ISO-C three-dimensional C-arm computed tomography system to determine the amount of unremoved cement and the loss of bone stock. The data of freehand-navigated cement removal is compared to conventionally extracted cement using levers and drills under X-ray control.

RESULTS

The mean time for cement removal was 29 ± 5 min for the conventional method and 32 ± 8 min for the freehand-navigated cement removal. Here, excepting the preparatory examinations, the navigated cement removal only took 13 ± 5 min. The measured temperature during polymerization was 36 ± 5 °C and during navigated cement removal was 37 ± 8 °C. In the distal part of the femur, cement removal was more accurate with the conventional method compared to the navigated one.

CONCLUSION

The freehand-navigated cement removal, with the exception of the preparatory examinations, is time saving compared to the conventional method. However, a potential for technical development especially for the milling device and accuracy exist.

摘要

背景

全髋关节置换术中骨水泥固定股骨柄的翻修手术越来越重要,但髋关节翻修术中的骨水泥去除在技术上可能具有挑战性。传统的手动骨水泥去除可能耗时且会伴有诸如皮质穿孔、骨折或骨质流失等并发症。本研究的目的是探讨计算机导航骨水泥去除的实用性。

材料与方法

在一项体外研究中,我们检查了从复合骨中去除骨水泥的情况。为评估准确性,在骨水泥去除前后用ISO-C三维C形臂计算机断层扫描系统对骨骼进行扫描,以确定未去除的骨水泥量和骨量损失。将徒手导航骨水泥去除的数据与在X射线控制下使用杠杆和钻头传统取出骨水泥的数据进行比较。

结果

传统方法去除骨水泥的平均时间为29±5分钟,徒手导航骨水泥去除的平均时间为32±8分钟。在此,除准备检查外,导航骨水泥去除仅需13±5分钟。聚合过程中测得的温度为36±5℃,导航骨水泥去除过程中测得的温度为37±8℃。在股骨远端,与导航方法相比,传统方法的骨水泥去除更准确。

结论

除准备检查外,徒手导航骨水泥去除与传统方法相比节省时间。然而,特别是对于铣削装置和准确性,存在技术发展的潜力。

相似文献

1
Femoral cement extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty--an in vitro study comparing computer-assisted freehand-navigated cement removal to conventional cement extraction.全髋关节置换翻修术中股骨骨水泥取出——一项体外研究,比较计算机辅助徒手导航下的骨水泥取出与传统骨水泥取出
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2015 Dec;60(6):567-75. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-0041.
2
Fluoroscopy-based 3-D reconstruction of femoral bone cement: a new approach for revision total hip replacement.基于荧光透视的股骨骨水泥三维重建:全髋关节翻修术的一种新方法。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005 Apr;52(4):664-75. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2005.844032.
3
Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation system for removal of distal femoral bone cement in revision total hip arthroplasty.用于翻修全髋关节置换术中取出股骨远端骨水泥的计算机辅助透视导航系统。
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Apr;22(3):445-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.010.
4
A-mode ultrasound-based intra-femoral bone cement detection and 3D reconstruction in RTHR.基于A型超声的全髋关节置换术中股骨内骨水泥检测及三维重建
Comput Aided Surg. 2007 May;12(3):168-75. doi: 10.3109/10929080701336132.
5
Histological findings of the femoral bone after cement removal in hip revision. An experimental study of cadaver femurs with two different cement removal procedures.髋关节翻修术中骨水泥取出后股骨的组织学研究结果。对采用两种不同骨水泥取出方法的尸体股骨进行的实验研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Jun;123(5):199-202. doi: 10.1007/s00402-002-0469-5. Epub 2003 May 13.
6
Removal of well-fixed fixed femoral stems.取出固定良好的股骨柄。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Feb;102(1 Suppl):S177-87. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.029. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
Hip revision arthroplasty. Approach to the femoral side.髋关节翻修置换术。股骨侧手术入路。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Dec(369):208-22.
8
Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.采用骨水泥内骨水泥技术翻修骨水泥型股骨柄:5至15年的回顾
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 May;91(5):577-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21621.
9
Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.初次使用骨水泥技术行全髋关节置换术股骨侧翻修,不使用植骨。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun;95(4):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
10
Revision of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique.采用骨水泥内骨水泥技术将半髋关节置换术翻修为全髋关节置换术。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Dec;97-B(12):1623-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.35814.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the Periprosthetic Fracture Pattern Depend on the Stem Fixation Method in Total Hip Arthroplasty?髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折模式是否取决于柄的固定方式?
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb;15(1):42-49. doi: 10.4055/cios22004. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
2
Impact of stem profile on the revisability and the need for osteotomy in well-fixed cemented revision total knee arthroplasty implants.股骨柄形态对固定良好的水泥型翻修全膝关节置换假体可翻修性及截骨需要的影响。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04559-2. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
3
Thermomechanical method for cement extraction in revision arthroplasty.
翻修关节成形术中骨水泥取出的热机械方法。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Dec;27(8):1125-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1941-9. Epub 2017 Mar 18.