Schindler Holly S, Kholoptseva Jenya, Oh Soojin S, Yoshikawa Hirokazu, Duncan Greg J, Magnuson Katherine A, Shonkoff Jack P
University of Washington, College of Education, Miller Hall, Box 353600, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Harvard University, USA.
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Jun;53(3):243-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.04.001.
Early childhood education (ECE) programs offer a promising mechanism for preventing early externalizing behavior problems and later antisocial behavior; yet, questions remain about how to best maximize ECE's potential. Using a meta-analytic database of 31 studies, we examined the overall effect of ECE on externalizing behavior problems and the differential effects of 3 levels of practice, each with increasing specificity and intensity aimed at children's social and emotional development. In short, we found that each successive level of programs did a better job than the prior level at reducing externalizing behavior problems. Level 1 programs, or those without a clear focus on social and emotional development, had no significant effects on externalizing behavior problems relative to control groups (ES=.13 SD, p<.10). On the other hand, level 2 programs, or those with a clear but broad focus on social and emotional development, were significantly associated with modest decreases in externalizing behavior problems relative to control groups (ES=-.10 SD, p<.05). Hence, level 2 programs were significantly better at reducing externalizing behavior problems than level 1 programs (ES=-.23 SD, p<.01). Level 3 programs, or those that more intensively targeted children's social and emotional development, were associated with additional significant reductions in externalizing behavior problems relative to level 2 programs (ES=-.26 SD, p<.05). The most promising effects came from level 3 child social skills training programs, which reduced externalizing behavior problems half of a standard deviation more than level 2 programs (ES=-.50 SD, p<.05).
幼儿教育(ECE)项目为预防早期外化行为问题及后期反社会行为提供了一种有前景的机制;然而,关于如何最大程度发挥幼儿教育的潜力仍存在问题。利用一个包含31项研究的元分析数据库,我们考察了幼儿教育对外化行为问题的总体影响,以及针对儿童社会和情感发展的三个实践水平(每个水平的针对性和强度都不断增加)的差异影响。简而言之,我们发现,项目的每一个连续水平在减少外化行为问题方面都比前一个水平做得更好。1级项目,即那些没有明确关注社会和情感发展的项目,相对于对照组,对外化行为问题没有显著影响(效应量=0.13标准差,p<0.10)。另一方面,2级项目,即那些明确但广泛关注社会和情感发展的项目,相对于对照组,与外化行为问题适度减少显著相关(效应量=-0.10标准差,p<0.05)。因此,2级项目在减少外化行为问题方面比1级项目显著更好(效应量=-0.23标准差,p<0.01)。3级项目,即那些更密集地针对儿童社会和情感发展的项目,相对于2级项目,与外化行为问题的进一步显著减少相关(效应量=-0.26标准差,p<0.05)。最有前景的效果来自3级儿童社会技能培训项目,该项目比2级项目多减少了半个标准差的外化行为问题(效应量=-0.50标准差,p<0.05)。