Kelamangalath Lakshmi, Tang Xiaoqing, Bezik Kathleen, Sterling Noelle, Son Young-Jin, Smith George M
Shriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Shriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Exp Neurol. 2015 Sep;271:262-78. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
Neurotrophins represent some of the best candidates to enhance regeneration. In the current study, we investigated the effects of artemin, a member of the glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) family, on sensory axon regeneration following a lumbar dorsal root injury and compared these effects with that observed after either NGF or GDNF expression in the rat spinal cord. Unlike previously published data, artemin failed to induce regeneration of large-diameter myelinated sensory afferents when expressed within either the spinal cord or DRG. However, artemin or NGF induced regeneration of calcitonin gene related peptide positive (CGRP(+)) axons only when expressed within the spinal cord. Accordingly, artemin or NGF enhanced recovery of only nociceptive behavior and showed a cFos distribution similar to the topography of regenerating axons. Artemin and GDNF signaling requires binding to different co-receptors (GFRα3 or GFRα1, respectively) prior to binding to the signaling receptor, cRet. Approximately 70% of DRG neurons express cRet, but only 35% express either co-receptor. To enhance artemin-induced regeneration, we co-expressed artemin with either GFRα3 or GDNF. Co-expression of artemin and GFRα3 only slightly enhanced regeneration of IB4(+) non-peptidergic nociceptive axons, but not myelinated axons. Interestingly, this co-expression also disrupted the ability of artemin to produce topographic targeting and lead to significant increases in cFos immunoreactivity within the deep dorsal laminae. This study failed to demonstrate artemin-induced regeneration of myelinated axons, even with co-expression of GFRα3, which only promoted mistargeted regeneration.
神经营养因子是促进再生的一些最佳候选物质。在本研究中,我们研究了胶质细胞源性神经营养因子(GDNF)家族成员Artemin对腰段背根损伤后感觉轴突再生的影响,并将这些影响与大鼠脊髓中NGF或GDNF表达后观察到的影响进行比较。与先前发表的数据不同,当在脊髓或背根神经节(DRG)中表达时,Artemin未能诱导大直径有髓感觉传入纤维的再生。然而,只有当在脊髓中表达时,Artemin或NGF才能诱导降钙素基因相关肽阳性(CGRP(+))轴突的再生。因此,Artemin或NGF仅增强了伤害性感受行为的恢复,并显示出与再生轴突的拓扑结构相似的cFos分布。Artemin和GDNF信号传导在与信号受体cRet结合之前需要分别与不同的共受体(分别为GFRα3或GFRα1)结合。大约70%的DRG神经元表达cRet,但只有35%表达其中任何一种共受体。为了增强Artemin诱导的再生,我们将Artemin与GFRα3或GDNF共表达。Artemin和GFRα3的共表达仅略微增强了IB4(+)非肽能伤害性轴突的再生,但对有髓轴突没有增强作用。有趣的是,这种共表达也破坏了Artemin产生拓扑靶向的能力,并导致深背层内cFos免疫反应性显著增加。即使与GFRα3共表达,本研究也未能证明Artemin诱导有髓轴突的再生,GFRα3仅促进了错误靶向的再生。