• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估从C8神经根出口至锁骨上窝的传导——其在胸廓出口综合征诊断中的价值。

Assessment of conduction from C8 nerve root exit to supraclavicular fossa--its value in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

作者信息

Pavot A P, Ignacio D R, Gargour G W

出版信息

Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov-Dec;29(7-8):445-51.

PMID:2606071
Abstract

Conduction across the thoracic outlet in the components of the lower trunk of the brachial plexus was studied. With the recording electrode over the abductor digiti quinti latencies of stimulation in the supraclavicular fossa and of the C8 nerve root were ascertained. The difference between these 2 values reflected conduction time between C8 and the supraclavicular fossa. Four normal volunteers, 150 patients without Thoracic Outlet Syndrome and 50 patients with clinical thoracic outlet syndrome were studied. Using this method, conduction time from C8 to supraclavicular fossa ranged from 0.4 to 1.2 msec (mean = 0.6570, S.D. = 0.2097) in patients without thoracic outlet syndrome, and from 1.0 to 2.6 msec (mean = 1.7836, S.D. = 0.1984) in patients with thoracic outlet syndrome. These values show a significant difference between the 2 groups at the 0.05 level of confidence (T-Test). In thoracic outlet syndrome, conduction time has a tendency to be prolonged and the value above 1.3 msec is strongly suggestive of thoracic outlet syndrome. The values are consistent and reproducible. This method is easy to carry out and is a useful addition to the diagnostic assessment of thoracic outlet syndrome.

摘要

对臂丛下干各组分在胸廓出口处的传导进行了研究。将记录电极置于小指展肌上,测定锁骨上窝刺激时的潜伏期以及C8神经根的潜伏期。这两个值之间的差异反映了C8与锁骨上窝之间的传导时间。研究了4名正常志愿者、150例无胸廓出口综合征的患者和50例临床诊断为胸廓出口综合征的患者。采用这种方法,无胸廓出口综合征患者从C8到锁骨上窝的传导时间为0.4至1.2毫秒(平均值 = 0.6570,标准差 = 0.2097),而胸廓出口综合征患者为1.0至2.6毫秒(平均值 = 1.7836,标准差 = 0.1984)。在0.05的置信水平下(t检验),两组之间的这些值存在显著差异。在胸廓出口综合征中,传导时间有延长的趋势,1.3毫秒以上的值强烈提示胸廓出口综合征。这些值是一致且可重复的。这种方法易于实施,是胸廓出口综合征诊断评估的一项有用补充。

相似文献

1
Assessment of conduction from C8 nerve root exit to supraclavicular fossa--its value in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.评估从C8神经根出口至锁骨上窝的传导——其在胸廓出口综合征诊断中的价值。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov-Dec;29(7-8):445-51.
2
Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve measurements to diagnose neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.测量臂内侧皮神经以诊断神经源性胸廓出口综合征。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;22(2):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.009.
3
Normative values for high voltage electrical stimulation across the brachial plexus.经臂丛神经的高压电刺激的标准值。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr-May;42(3):151-7.
4
Somatosensory evoked responses as a diagnostic aid in thoracic outlet syndrome. A preoperative study.体感诱发电位作为胸廓出口综合征诊断辅助手段的术前研究。
Acta Chir Scand. 1982;148(8):647-52.
5
Electrodiagnostic values through the thoracic outlet using C8 root needle studies, F-waves, and cervical somatosensory evoked potentials.通过使用C8神经根针检查、F波和颈段体感诱发电位来评估胸廓出口处的电诊断价值。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984 Nov;65(11):726-30.
6
[Electrophysiological diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome].[神经源性胸廓出口综合征的电生理诊断]
J Mal Vasc. 2000 Jun;25(3):175-80.
7
Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction study, a new tool to demonstrate mild lower brachial plexus lesions. A report of 16 cases.臂内侧皮神经传导研究:一种显示轻度下臂丛神经损伤的新工具。附16例报告。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Oct;115(10):2316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.023.
8
Ulnar trunk conduction studies in the diagnosis of the thoracic outlet syndrome.
Acta Chir Scand. 1973;139(7):597-603.
9
Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction in true neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.真性神经源性胸廓出口综合征的前臂内侧皮神经传导
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jul-Aug;33(5):285-8.
10
F wave evaluation of thoracic outlet syndrome: a multiple regression derived F wave latency predicting technique.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978 Oct;59(10):464-9.