Institute of Education EPPI-Centre, SSRU 18 Woburn Square, London WC1H 0NR, U.K..
University of Manchester, National Centre for Text Mining, Manchester, U.K.
Res Synth Methods. 2011 Mar;2(1):1-14. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.27. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
Systematic reviews are a widely accepted research method. However, it is increasingly difficult to conduct them to fit with policy and practice timescales, particularly in areas which do not have well indexed, comprehensive bibliographic databases. Text mining technologies offer one possible way forward in reducing the amount of time systematic reviews take to conduct. They can facilitate the identification of relevant literature, its rapid description or categorization, and its summarization. In this paper, we describe the application of four text mining technologies, namely, automatic term recognition, document clustering, classification and summarization, which support the identification of relevant studies in systematic reviews. The contributions of text mining technologies to improve reviewing efficiency are considered and their strengths and weaknesses explored. We conclude that these technologies do have the potential to assist at various stages of the review process. However, they are relatively unknown in the systematic reviewing community, and substantial evaluation and methods development are required before their possible impact can be fully assessed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
系统评价是一种被广泛认可的研究方法。然而,要使其适应政策和实践的时间框架越来越困难,特别是在那些没有索引良好、全面的文献数据库的领域。文本挖掘技术提供了一种可能的方法,可以减少系统评价所需的时间。它们可以促进相关文献的识别、快速描述或分类,以及总结。在本文中,我们描述了四种文本挖掘技术的应用,即自动术语识别、文档聚类、分类和总结,这些技术支持系统评价中相关研究的识别。我们考虑了文本挖掘技术对提高审查效率的贡献,并探讨了它们的优缺点。我们的结论是,这些技术确实有可能在审查过程的各个阶段提供帮助。然而,它们在系统评价界相对不为人知,需要进行大量的评估和方法开发,才能充分评估其可能的影响。版权所有© 2011 约翰威立父子有限公司