Carstairs Catherine
Catherine Carstairs is with the Department of History, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):1559-69. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302660. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
In the 1930s, scientists learned that small amounts of fluoride naturally occurring in water could protect teeth from decay, and the idea of artificially adding fluoride to public water supplies to achieve the same effect arose. In the 1940s and early 1950s, a number of studies were completed to determine whether fluoride could have harmful effects. The research suggested that the possibility of harm was small. In the early 1950s, Canadian and US medical, dental, and public health bodies all endorsed water fluoridation. I argue in this article that some early concerns about the toxicity of fluoride were put aside as evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of water fluoridation mounted and as the opposition was taken over by people with little standing in the scientific, medical, and dental communities. The sense of optimism that infused postwar science and the desire of dentists to have a magic bullet that could wipe out tooth decay also affected the scientific debate.
20世纪30年代,科学家们了解到天然存在于水中的少量氟化物可以保护牙齿免受龋齿侵害,于是产生了向公共供水系统中人工添加氟化物以达到相同效果的想法。在20世纪40年代和50年代初,完成了多项研究以确定氟化物是否会产生有害影响。研究表明危害的可能性很小。20世纪50年代初,加拿大和美国的医学、牙科和公共卫生机构都认可了水氟化。我在本文中认为,随着水氟化有效性和安全性的证据不断增加,以及反对者被在科学、医学和牙科领域没有什么地位的人所取代,一些早期对氟化物毒性的担忧被搁置一旁。战后科学中弥漫的乐观情绪以及牙医们想要找到一种能消除龋齿的神奇方法的愿望也影响了这场科学辩论。