de Leeuw Evelyne, Green Geoff, Tsouros Agis, Dyakova Mariana, Farrington Jill, Faskunger Johan, Grant Marcus, Ison Erica, Jackisch Josephine, Lafond Leah Janss, Lease Helen, Mackiewicz Karolina, Östergren Per-Olof, Palmer Nicola, Ritsatakis Anna, Simos Jean, Spanswick Lucy, Webster Premila, Zamaro Gianna, Crown June, Kickbusch Ilona, Rasmussen Niels, Scally Gabriel, Biddle Marian, Earl Suzanne, Petersen Connie, Devlin Joan
Glocal Health Consultants, Geelong, Australia
Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30 Suppl 1:i118-i125. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav047.
In this article we reflect on the quality of a realist synthesis paradigm applied to the evaluation of Phase V of the WHO European Healthy Cities Network. The programmatic application of this approach has led to very high response rates and a wealth of important data. All articles in this Supplement report that cities in the network move from small-scale, time-limited projects predominantly focused on health lifestyles to the significant inclusion of policies and programmes on systems and values for good health governance. The evaluation team felt that, due to time and resource limitations, it was unable to fully exploit the potential of realist synthesis. In particular, the synthetic integration of different strategic foci of Phase V designation areas did not come to full fruition. We recommend better and more sustained integration of realist synthesis in the practice of Healthy Cities in future Phases.
在本文中，我们思考了将现实主义综合范式应用于世界卫生组织欧洲健康城市网络第五阶段评估的质量。这种方法的程序化应用带来了很高的回应率和大量重要数据。本增刊中的所有文章都报告称，该网络中的城市从小规模、限时的主要关注健康生活方式的项目，转向大量纳入关于促进健康治理的系统和价值观的政策与计划。评估团队认为，由于时间和资源限制，无法充分挖掘现实主义综合的潜力。特别是，第五阶段指定领域不同战略重点的综合整合未能完全实现。我们建议在未来阶段的健康城市实践中更好、更持续地整合现实主义综合。
