Nguyen Christine, Milstein Arnold, Hernandez-Boussard Tina, Curtin Catherine M
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Aug;40(8):1657-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
To better understand how perioperative care affects charges for carpal tunnel release (CTR).
We developed a cohort using ICD9-CM procedure code 04.43 for CTR in the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery 2006 to test perioperative factors potentially associated with CTR costs. We examined factors that might affect costs, including patient characteristics, payer, surgical time, setting (hospital outpatient department vs. freestanding ambulatory surgery center), anesthesia type, anesthesia provider, discharge status, and adverse events. Records were grouped by facility to reduce the impact of surgeon and patient heterogeneity. Facilities were divided into quintiles based on average total facility charges per CTR. This division allowed comparison of factors associated with the lowest and highest quintile of facilities based on average charge per CTR.
A total of 160,000 CTRs were performed in 2006. Nearly all patients were discharged home without adverse events. Mean charge across facilities was $2,572 (SD, $2,331-$2,813). Patient complexity and intraoperative duration of surgery was similar across quintiles (approximately 13 min). Anesthesia techniques were not significantly associated with patient complexity, charges, and total perioperative time. Hospital outpatient department setting was strongly associated with total charges, with $500 higher charge per CTR. Half of all CTRs were performed in hospital outpatient departments. Facilities in the lowest quintile charge group were freestanding ambulatory surgery centers.
Examination of charges for CTR suggests that surgical setting is a large cost driver with the potential opportunity to lower charges for CTRs by approximately 30% if performed in ASCs.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/decision analysis II.
更好地了解围手术期护理如何影响腕管松解术(CTR)的费用。
我们在2006年门诊手术全国调查中,使用ICD9-CM手术代码04.43进行CTR,建立了一个队列,以测试可能与CTR成本相关的围手术期因素。我们研究了可能影响成本的因素,包括患者特征、付款人、手术时间、手术地点(医院门诊部与独立门诊手术中心)、麻醉类型、麻醉提供者、出院状态和不良事件。记录按机构分组,以减少外科医生和患者异质性的影响。根据每个CTR的平均机构总费用,将机构分为五等份。这种划分允许比较基于每个CTR平均费用的最低和最高五分之一机构相关的因素。
2006年共进行了160,000例CTR。几乎所有患者均无不良事件出院。各机构的平均费用为2572美元(标准差,2331 - 2813美元)。各五等份的患者复杂性和手术术中持续时间相似(约13分钟)。麻醉技术与患者复杂性、费用和围手术期总时间无显著关联。医院门诊部的手术地点与总费用密切相关,每个CTR的费用高出500美元。所有CTR中有一半在医院门诊部进行。最低五分之一费用组的机构是独立门诊手术中心。
对CTR费用的检查表明,手术地点是一个很大的成本驱动因素,如果在门诊手术中心进行,有可能将CTR费用降低约30%。
研究类型/证据水平:经济/决策分析II。