Gener J, Moreno J, Mesalles E, Rodríguez N, Almirall J
Med Clin (Barc). 1989 Oct 21;93(12):445-8.
Eighty consecutive patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiorespiratory arrest (CRA) were prospectively studied. The immediate survival rate and the survival rates after 48 hours, at the time of hospital discharge and one year later were evaluated. Forty-one patients (51%) initially recovered from CRA, 20 died in the hospital and 17 (21% of the initial group) survived after one year. Survival was related to: 1) the mechanism of CRA. Ventricular tachycardia-fibrillation (VT-VF) had a better prognosis than asystole (AS) and electromechanical dissociation (EMD) (p less than 0.005). 2) Duration of CPR. The survival was higher when CPR lasted for less than 15 minutes (p less than 0.001). 3) Underlying disease. The classification of the patients in three categories depending on the underlying condition permitted an approach to the prognosis of CPR. Group A: patients who did not benefit from CPR, without survivors at the time of hospital discharge. Group B: patients who had a benefit from CPR, with a 37% survival at the time of hospital discharge and 33% after one year, with a good quality of life and a good neurological status. Group C: patients in whom the benefit of CPR was variable, with a similar survival rate as group B at the time of discharge, but with a reduction to 20% in the subsequent year.
对80例因心肺骤停(CRA)需要进行心肺复苏(CPR)的连续患者进行了前瞻性研究。评估了即时生存率、48小时后、出院时及一年后的生存率。41例患者(51%)最初从CRA中恢复,20例在医院死亡,17例(占初始组的21%)一年后存活。生存率与以下因素有关:1)CRA的机制。室性心动过速-心室颤动(VT-VF)的预后优于心脏停搏(AS)和电机械分离(EMD)(p<0.005)。2)CPR持续时间。CPR持续时间少于15分钟时生存率更高(p<0.001)。3)基础疾病。根据基础疾病将患者分为三类有助于评估CPR的预后。A组:未从CPR中获益的患者,出院时无存活者。B组:从CPR中获益的患者,出院时生存率为37%,一年后为33%,生活质量良好,神经状态良好。C组:CPR获益情况不一的患者,出院时生存率与B组相似,但次年降至20%。