Wubulihasimu Parida, Brouwer Werner, van Baal Pieter
Institute of Medical Technology Assessment/Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Econ. 2016 Aug;25(8):1005-19. doi: 10.1002/hec.3205. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
In this study, aggregate-level panel data from 20 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries over three decades (1980-2009) were used to investigate the impact of hospital payment reforms on healthcare output and mortality. Hospital payment schemes were classified as fixed-budget (i.e. not directly based on activities), fee-for-service (FFS) or patient-based payment (PBP) schemes. The data were analysed using a difference-in-difference model that allows for a structural change in outcomes due to payment reform. The results suggest that FFS schemes increase the growth rate of healthcare output, whereas PBP schemes positively affect life expectancy at age 65 years. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, as results are sensitive to model specification. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
在本研究中,使用了来自20个经济合作与发展组织国家三十年(1980 - 2009年)的总体层面面板数据,以调查医院支付改革对医疗产出和死亡率的影响。医院支付方案被分类为固定预算(即不直接基于活动)、按服务收费(FFS)或基于患者的支付(PBP)方案。使用差分模型对数据进行分析,该模型考虑了由于支付改革导致的结果结构变化。结果表明,按服务收费方案提高了医疗产出的增长率,而基于患者的支付方案对65岁时的预期寿命有积极影响。然而,这些结果应谨慎解释,因为结果对模型设定很敏感。版权所有© 2015约翰·威利父子有限公司。