Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中治疗,第2部分:治疗“毛细血管指数评分、血管再通与时间的作用”

Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment, Part 2: Treatment "Roles of Capillary Index Score, Revascularization and Time".

作者信息

Al-Ali Firas, Elias John J, Filipkowski Danielle E

机构信息

Department of Neuro Interventional Surgery, Akron General Medical Center , Akron, OH , USA.

Department of Research, Akron General Medical Center , Akron, OH , USA.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2015 Jun 1;6:117. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00117. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Due to recent results from clinical intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke (IAT-AIS) trials such as the interventional management of stroke III, IAT-AIS and the merit of revascularization have been contested. Even though intra-arterial treatment (IAT) has been shown to improve revascularization rates, a corresponding increase in good outcomes has only recently been noted. Even though a significant percentage of patients achieve good revascularization in a timely manner, results do not translate into good clinical outcomes (GCOs). Based on a review of the literature, the authors suspect limited GCOs following timely and successful revascularization are due to poor patient selection that led to futile and possibly even harmful revascularization. The capillary index score (CIS) is a simple angiography-based scale that can potentially be used to improve patient selection to prevent revascularization being performed on patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment. The CIS characterizes presence of capillary blush related to collateral flow as a marker of residual viable tissue, with absence of blush indicating the tissue is no longer viable due to ischemia. By only selecting patients with a favorable CIS for IAT, the rate of GCOs should consistently approach 80-90%. Current methods of patient selection are primarily dependent on time from ischemia. Time from cerebral ischemia to irreversible tissue damage seems to vary from patient to patient; so focusing on viable tissue based on the CIS rather than relying on an artificial time window seems to be a more appropriate approach to patient selection.

摘要

由于近期急性缺血性卒中动脉内治疗(IAT-AIS)临床试验的结果,如卒中的介入管理III、IAT-AIS,血管再通的价值受到了质疑。尽管动脉内治疗(IAT)已被证明可提高血管再通率,但直到最近才注意到相应的良好预后有所增加。即使相当大比例的患者能及时实现良好的血管再通,但结果并未转化为良好的临床预后(GCOs)。基于文献综述,作者怀疑及时且成功的血管再通后GCOs有限是由于患者选择不当,导致了无效甚至可能有害的血管再通。毛细血管指数评分(CIS)是一种基于血管造影的简单量表,有可能用于改善患者选择,以防止对不太可能从治疗中获益的患者进行血管再通。CIS将与侧支血流相关的毛细血管充盈情况作为残余存活组织的标志,无充盈表明组织因缺血不再存活。通过仅为IAT选择CIS良好的患者,GCOs的比例应持续接近80%-90%。目前的患者选择方法主要依赖于缺血时间。从脑缺血到不可逆组织损伤的时间似乎因患者而异;因此,基于CIS关注存活组织而非依赖人为设定的时间窗似乎是更合适的患者选择方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1f3/4450589/068517bfdea5/fneur-06-00117-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验