Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati Neuroscience Institute, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0525, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 7;368(10):893-903. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214300. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
Endovascular therapy is increasingly used after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, but whether a combined approach is more effective than intravenous t-PA alone is uncertain.
We randomly assigned eligible patients who had received intravenous t-PA within 3 hours after symptom onset to receive additional endovascular therapy or intravenous t-PA alone, in a 2:1 ratio. The primary outcome measure was a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or less (indicating functional independence) at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability).
The study was stopped early because of futility after 656 participants had undergone randomization (434 patients to endovascular therapy and 222 to intravenous t-PA alone). The proportion of participants with a modified Rankin score of 2 or less at 90 days did not differ significantly according to treatment (40.8% with endovascular therapy and 38.7% with intravenous t-PA; absolute adjusted difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to 9.1, with adjustment for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score [8-19, indicating moderately severe stroke, or ≥20, indicating severe stroke]), nor were there significant differences for the predefined subgroups of patients with an NIHSS score of 20 or higher (6.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 18.1) and those with a score of 19 or lower (-1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -10.8 to 8.8). Findings in the endovascular-therapy and intravenous t-PA groups were similar for mortality at 90 days (19.1% and 21.6%, respectively; P=0.52) and the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 30 hours after initiation of t-PA (6.2% and 5.9%, respectively; P=0.83).
The trial showed similar safety outcomes and no significant difference in functional independence with endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA, as compared with intravenous t-PA alone. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00359424.).
对于中等至重度急性缺血性脑卒中患者,在给予静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活物(t-PA)后,越来越多地采用血管内治疗,但联合治疗是否比单纯静脉 t-PA 更有效尚不确定。
我们将在症状出现后 3 小时内接受静脉 t-PA 治疗的合格患者以 2:1 的比例随机分为接受额外血管内治疗或单独静脉 t-PA 治疗。主要结局测量指标为 90 天时改良 Rankin 量表评分为 2 或更低(表示功能独立)(评分范围为 0 至 6,分数越高表示残疾程度越高)。
在 656 名患者接受随机分组(434 名患者接受血管内治疗,222 名患者接受单独静脉 t-PA 治疗)后,由于无效而提前停止了研究。90 天时改良 Rankin 量表评分为 2 或更低的患者比例在不同治疗组之间无显著差异(血管内治疗组为 40.8%,静脉 t-PA 治疗组为 38.7%;绝对调整差异为 1.5 个百分点;95%置信区间[CI]为-6.1 至 9.1,经国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分[8-19,提示中度重度卒中,或≥20,提示重度卒中]校正),NIHSS 评分为 20 或更高(6.8 个百分点;95%CI,-4.4 至 18.1)和 NIHSS 评分为 19 或更低(-1.0 个百分点;95%CI,-10.8 至 8.8)的亚组患者之间也无显著差异。血管内治疗组和静脉 t-PA 组在 90 天时的死亡率(分别为 19.1%和 21.6%;P=0.52)和 t-PA 开始后 30 小时内症状性颅内出血的患者比例(分别为 6.2%和 5.9%;P=0.83)相似。
与单独静脉 t-PA 相比,该试验显示血管内治疗联合静脉 t-PA 后安全性结局相似,且功能独立性无显著差异。(由美国国立卫生研究院等资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00359424.)