Roy Sunetra, de Melo Abinadabe J, Xu Yao, Tadi Satish K, Négrel Aurélie, Hendrickson Eric, Modesti Mauro, Meek Katheryn
College of Veterinary Medicine and Departments of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics and Pathobiology & Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, CNRS, UMR7258, Marseille, France INSERM, U1068, Marseille, France Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Sep 1;35(17):3017-28. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01503-14. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
The classic nonhomologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) pathway is largely responsible for repairing double-strand breaks (DSBs) in mammalian cells. XLF stimulates the XRCC4/DNA ligase IV complex by an unknown mechanism. XLF interacts with XRCC4 to form filaments of alternating XRCC4 and XLF dimers that bridge DNA ends in vitro, providing a mechanism by which XLF might stimulate ligation. Here, we characterize two XLF mutants that do not interact with XRCC4 and cannot form filaments or bridge DNA in vitro. One mutant is fully sufficient in stimulating ligation by XRCC4/Lig4 in vitro; the other is not. This separation-of-function mutant (which must function as an XLF homodimer) fully complements the c-NHEJ deficits of some XLF-deficient cell strains but not others, suggesting a variable requirement for XRCC4/XLF interaction in living cells. To determine whether the lack of XRCC4/XLF interaction (and potential bridging) can be compensated for by other factors, candidate repair factors were disrupted in XLF- or XRCC4-deficient cells. The loss of either ATM or the newly described XRCC4/XLF-like factor, PAXX, accentuates the requirement for XLF. However, in the case of ATM/XLF loss (but not PAXX/XLF loss), this reflects a greater requirement for XRCC4/XLF interaction.
经典的非同源末端连接(c-NHEJ)途径在很大程度上负责修复哺乳动物细胞中的双链断裂(DSB)。XLF通过未知机制刺激XRCC4/DNA连接酶IV复合物。XLF与XRCC4相互作用形成由交替的XRCC4和XLF二聚体组成的细丝,这些细丝在体外连接DNA末端,为XLF可能刺激连接提供了一种机制。在这里,我们鉴定了两个不与XRCC4相互作用且在体外不能形成细丝或连接DNA的XLF突变体。一个突变体在体外刺激XRCC4/Lig4连接方面完全足够;另一个则不然。这种功能分离突变体(必须作为XLF同二聚体起作用)完全弥补了一些XLF缺陷细胞株的c-NHEJ缺陷,但不能弥补其他细胞株的缺陷,这表明活细胞中对XRCC4/XLF相互作用的需求存在差异。为了确定XRCC4/XLF相互作用(以及潜在的桥接)的缺乏是否可以被其他因素补偿,在XLF或XRCC4缺陷细胞中破坏了候选修复因子。ATM或新描述的XRCC4/XLF样因子PAXX的缺失加剧了对XLF的需求。然而,在ATM/XLF缺失的情况下(但不是PAXX/XLF缺失),这反映了对XRCC4/XLF相互作用的更大需求。