Tong Xu, Chen Xiaoming, Li Jinsheng, Xu Qianqian, Lin Mu-Han, Chen Lili, Price Robert A, Ma Chang-Ming
Third-Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 8;16(2):5013. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5013.
This paper investigates the clinical significance of real-time monitoring of intrafractional prostate motion during external beam radiotherapy using a commercial 4D localization system. Intrafractional prostate motion was tracked during 8,660 treatment fractions for 236 patients. The following statistics were analyzed: 1) the percentage of fractions in which the prostate shifted 2-7 mm for a certain duration; 2) the proportion of the entire tracking time during which the prostate shifted 2-7mm; and 3) the proportion of each minute in which the shift exceeded 2-7 mm. The ten patients exhibiting maximum intrafractional-motion patterns were analyzed separately. Our results showed that the percentage of fractions in which the prostate shifted by > 2, 3, 5, and 7 mm off the baseline in any direction for > 30 s was 56.8%, 27.2%, 4.6%, and 0.7% for intact prostate and 68.7%, 35.6%, 10.1%, and 1.8% for postprostatectomy patients, respectively. For the ten patients, these percentages were 91.3%, 72.4%, 36.3%, and 6%, respectively. The percentage of tracking time during which the prostate shifted > 2, 3, 5, and 7 mm was 27.8%, 10.7%, 1.6%, and 0.3%, respectively, and it was 56.2%, 33.7%, 11.2%, and 2.1%, respectively, for the ten patients. The percentage of tracking time for a > 3 mm posterior motion was four to five times higher than that in other directions. For treatments completed in 5 min (VMAT) and 10 min (IMRT), the proportion for the prostate to shift by > 3mm was 4% and 12%, respectively. Although intrafractional prostate motion was generally small, caution should be taken for patients who exhibit frequent large intrafractional motion. For those patients, adjustment of patient positioning may be necessary or a larger treatment margin may be used. After the initial alignment, the likelihood of prostate motion increases with time. Therefore, it is favorable to use advanced techniques (e.g., VMAT) that require less delivery time in order to reduce the treatment uncertainty resulting from intrafractional prostate motion.
本文使用商用4D定位系统研究了在体外放疗期间实时监测前列腺分次内运动的临床意义。对236例患者的8660个治疗分次进行了前列腺分次内运动跟踪。分析了以下统计数据:1)前列腺在一定持续时间内移动2 - 7毫米的分次百分比;2)前列腺移动2 - 7毫米的整个跟踪时间的比例;3)每分钟移动超过2 - 7毫米的比例。对表现出最大分次内运动模式的10名患者进行了单独分析。我们的结果显示,完整前列腺在任何方向上偏离基线>2、3、5和7毫米且持续>30秒的分次百分比分别为56.8%、27.2%、4.6%和0.7%,前列腺切除术后患者分别为68.7%、35.6%、10.1%和1.8%。对于这10名患者,这些百分比分别为91.3%、72.4%、36.3%和6%。前列腺移动>2、3、5和7毫米的跟踪时间百分比分别为27.8%、10.7%、1.6%和0.3%,这10名患者分别为56.2%、33.7%、11.2%和2.1%。向后移动>3毫米的跟踪时间百分比比其他方向高4至5倍。对于在5分钟(容积调强放疗)和10分钟(调强放疗)内完成的治疗,前列腺移动>3毫米的比例分别为4%和12%。虽然前列腺分次内运动通常较小,但对于表现出频繁的大分次内运动的患者应谨慎。对于这些患者,可能需要调整患者体位或使用更大的治疗边界。在初始对齐后,前列腺运动的可能性随时间增加。因此,使用需要较少递送时间的先进技术(如容积调强放疗)以减少由前列腺分次内运动导致的治疗不确定性是有利的。