Suppr超能文献

前列腺立体定向体放射治疗:使用新的 BIR 几何不确定性在每日在线 IGRT 推荐中量化分次内运动并计算边界。

Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations.

机构信息

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2023 Jun 1;96(1146):20220852. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220852. Epub 2023 Apr 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To measure the magnitude of intra-fraction prostate motion (IFPM) during stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered without intra-fraction tracking.To assess if current margins adequately cover IFPM.To derive margins using new guidelines.

METHODS

IFPM was determined in 20 patients receiving 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using 97 pairs of pre- and post-treatment cone beam CT (CBCT) scans. Correlation of time between CBCT acquisitions and motion was determined. The magnitude of IFPM was compared to current margins (6 mm isotropic, 3 mm posterior). Margins were calculated using IFPM alone and updated guidelines.

RESULTS

The averaged 3D root mean square IFPM was 2.5 mm (4.2 mm). Independent prostate motion was predominantly posterior (70%) and inferior (63%). There was weak correlation between posterior (ρ = 0.38) and inferior (ρ = 0.36) IFPM and time. IFPM greater than current margins occurred in 8 of 97 fractions, six in the posterior direction. Margins were ≤3.5 mm using IFPM alone and ≤3.3 mm Left 3.5 mm Right, 7.0 mm inferior, 3.7 mm superior, 4.4 mm anterior and 3.3 mm posterior using new guidelines, compensating for motion in 92% of fractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our current SBRT margins account for 92% of IFPM, predominantly posterior and inferior. Although updated guidelines suggest an increase in margins inferiorly, any increase must be balanced against the possibility of increased toxicity, particularly if biochemical control and side-effects are favourable with current practice.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The difference between current clinical margins and those determined using updated guidance is demonstrated. The implications must be considered against clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

测量立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)期间无分次内跟踪时前列腺的分次内运动(IFPM)幅度。评估当前的边缘是否足以覆盖 IFPM。使用新指南推导边缘。

方法

使用 97 对治疗前后锥形束 CT(CBCT)扫描,对 20 名接受 36.25Gy 分 5 次治疗的患者进行 IFPM 测定。确定 CBCT 采集和运动之间的时间相关性。将 IFPM 的幅度与当前边缘(各向同性 6mm,后向 3mm)进行比较。使用 IFPM 单独和更新的指南计算边缘。

结果

平均 3D 均方根 IFPM 为 2.5mm(4.2mm)。独立的前列腺运动主要是向后(70%)和向下(63%)。后向(ρ=0.38)和下向(ρ=0.36)IFPM 与时间之间存在弱相关性。在 97 个分次中有 8 个分次出现大于当前边缘的 IFPM,其中 6 个在向后方向。仅使用 IFPM 时,边缘≤3.5mm,使用新指南时,左边缘≤3.5mm,右边缘 7.0mm,下边缘 3.7mm,上边缘 4.4mm,前边缘 3.3mm,后边缘 3.3mm,可补偿 92%的分次中的运动。

结论

我们目前的 SBRT 边缘可覆盖 92%的 IFPM,主要是向后和向下。尽管更新的指南建议在下方增加边缘,但必须权衡增加毒性的可能性,特别是如果当前实践具有良好的生化控制和副作用。

知识进展

显示了当前临床边缘与使用更新指南确定的边缘之间的差异。必须根据临床结果来考虑这些差异的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f0a/10230383/ceb38e3d2617/bjr.20220852.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验