Sarig Rachel, Hershkovitz Israel, Shpack Nir, May Hila, Vardimon Alexander D
Department of Orthodontics, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Dan David Center for Human Evolution and Biohistory, The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History and National Research Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2015 Aug;123(4):276-81. doi: 10.1111/eos.12198. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
Although occlusal and interproximal attrition occur because of diverse etiology and present dissimilar features, both progress with age. The objectives of this study were to reveal the rate and pattern of development of interproximal attrition facets (PAF) with age and to compare those with occlusal attrition (OA) changes. Five-hundred and ninety-four teeth were collected from 198 skulls (of adults, 20-71 yr of age). Three mandibular teeth [first premolar (P1), second premolar (P2), and first molar (M1)] were examined for PAF size and OA rate. Interproximal attrition and OA followed similar patterns of development until subjects reached 40-45 yr of age, after which they took different paths: PAF did not increase in size and were not as large as in younger groups, regardless of facet location, whereas OA continued to progress. The PAF changes with age differed between premolars and molars, unlike OA, which presented a similar rate for all teeth studied. Although OA scores presented significantly moderate correlations with age, PAF area size demonstrated low correlations with age. Low, but significant, correlations were found between the rate of OA and that of PAF. However, PAF and OA exhibited different patterns of development with age. Premolars and molars presented dissimilar development of PAF, which is probably caused by a unique attrition pattern in the molar teeth, different morphology, and force vectors.
尽管咬合面磨损和邻面磨损由于病因不同而表现出不同的特征,但两者都会随着年龄增长而进展。本研究的目的是揭示邻面磨损小平面(PAF)随年龄增长的发展速率和模式,并将其与咬合面磨损(OA)的变化进行比较。从198个成年人(20 - 71岁)的颅骨中收集了594颗牙齿。检查了三颗下颌牙齿[第一前磨牙(P1)、第二前磨牙(P2)和第一磨牙(M1)]的PAF大小和OA速率。邻面磨损和OA在受试者达到40 - 45岁之前遵循相似的发展模式,之后它们分道扬镳:无论小平面位置如何,PAF的大小都不再增加,且不如较年轻组的大,而OA则继续进展。前磨牙和磨牙的PAF随年龄的变化有所不同,与OA不同,OA在所研究的所有牙齿中呈现相似的速率。尽管OA评分与年龄呈显著的中度相关性,但PAF面积大小与年龄的相关性较低。OA速率和PAF速率之间存在低但显著的相关性。然而,PAF和OA随年龄呈现出不同的发展模式。前磨牙和磨牙的PAF发展不同,这可能是由磨牙独特的磨损模式、不同的形态和力向量导致的。