Masoodi Mohsen, Talebi-Taher Mahshid, Tabatabaie Khadijeh, Khaleghi Siamak, Faghihi Amir-Hossein, Agah Shahram, Asadi Reyhaneh
Associate professor, Colorectal Research Center, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Associate professor, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Infectious Diseases Department, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2015 Apr;7(2):88-93.
BACKGROUND Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection plays a crucial role in the treatment of peptic ulcer. Clarithromycin resistance is a major cause of treatment failure. This randomized clinical trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a clarithromycin versus gemifloxacin containing quadruple therapy regimen in eradication of H.pylori infection. METHODS In this randomized double blind clinical trial (RCT 2012102011054N2), a total of 120 patients were randomized to two groups of 60 patients each. Patients with proven H.pylori infection were consecutively assigned into two groups to receive OBAG or OBAC in gastroenterology clinic in Rasoul-e- Akram General Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The patients in the OBAG group received omeprazole (20 mg) twice daily, bismuth subcitrate (240 mg) twice daily, amoxicillin (1 gr) twice daily, and gemifloxacin (320 mg) once daily, and those in the OBAC group received omeprazole (20 mg) twice daily, 240 mg of bismuth subcitrate twice daily, amoxicillin (1 gr) twice daily, and clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily for 10 days. RESULTS Five patients from each group were excluded from the study because of poor compliance, so 110 patients completed the study. The intention-to-treat eradication rate was 61.6% and 66.6% for the OBAC and OBAG groups, respectively. According to the per protocol analysis, the success rates of eradication of H.pylori infection were 67.2% and 72.7% for OBAC and OBAG groups, respectively (p=0.568). CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that gemifloxacin containing regimen is at least as effective as clarithromycin regimen; hence, this new treatment could be considered as an alternative for the patients who cannot tolerate clarithromycin.
背景 根除幽门螺杆菌感染在消化性溃疡治疗中起着关键作用。克拉霉素耐药是治疗失败的主要原因。这项随机临床试验旨在评估含克拉霉素的四联疗法与含吉米沙星的四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效。方法 在这项随机双盲临床试验(RCT 2012102011054N2)中,总共120例患者被随机分为两组,每组60例。确诊为幽门螺杆菌感染的患者在伊朗德黑兰拉苏勒 - 阿克拉姆综合医院的胃肠病诊所连续被分为两组,分别接受OBAG或OBAC治疗。OBAG组患者每日两次口服奥美拉唑(20毫克)、每日两次口服次枸橼酸铋(240毫克)、每日两次口服阿莫西林(1克)、每日一次口服吉米沙星(320毫克),OBAC组患者每日两次口服奥美拉唑(20毫克)、每日两次口服240毫克次枸橼酸铋、每日两次口服阿莫西林(1克)、每日两次口服克拉霉素(500毫克),疗程为10天。结果 每组各有5例患者因依从性差被排除在研究之外,因此110例患者完成了研究。意向性分析中,OBAC组和OBAG组的根除率分别为61.6%和66.6%。根据符合方案分析,OBAC组和OBAG组幽门螺杆菌感染的根除成功率分别为67.2%和72.7%(p = 0.568)。结论 本研究结果表明,含吉米沙星的治疗方案至少与含克拉霉素的治疗方案效果相当;因此,对于不能耐受克拉霉素的患者,这种新的治疗方法可被视为一种替代方案。