Francis Claire E, Longmuir Patricia E, Boyer Charles, Andersen Lars Bo, Barnes Joel D, Boiarskaia Elena, Cairney John, Faigenbaum Avery D, Faulkner Guy, Hands Beth P, Hay John A, Janssen Ian, Katzmarzyk Peter T, Kemper Han C, Knudson Duane, Lloyd Meghann, McKenzie Thomas L, Olds Tim S, Sacheck Jennifer M, Shephard Roy J, Zhu Weimo, Tremblay Mark S
Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Feb;13(2):214-22. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0597. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
The Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL) was conceptualized as a tool to monitor children's physical literacy. The original model (fitness, activity behavior, knowledge, motor skill) required revision and relative weights for calculating/interpreting scores were required.
Nineteen childhood physical activity/fitness experts completed a 3-round Delphi process. Round 1 was open-ended questions. Subsequent rounds rated statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Recommendations were sought regarding protocol inclusion, relative importance within composite scores and score interpretation.
Delphi participant consensus was achieved for 64% (47/73) of statement topics, including a revised conceptual model, specific assessment protocols, the importance of longitudinal tracking, and the relative importance of individual protocols and composite scores. Divergent opinions remained regarding the inclusion of sleep time, assessment/ scoring of the obstacle course assessment of motor skill, and the need for an overall physical literacy classification.
The revised CAPL model (overlapping domains of physical competence, motivation, and knowledge, encompassed by daily behavior) is appropriate for monitoring the physical literacy of children aged 8 to 12 years. Objectively measured domains (daily behavior, physical competence) have higher relative importance. The interpretation of CAPL results should be reevaluated as more data become available.
加拿大身体素质素养评估(CAPL)被构想为一种监测儿童身体素质素养的工具。原始模型(体能、活动行为、知识、运动技能)需要修订,并且需要计算/解释分数的相对权重。
19名儿童身体活动/体能专家完成了三轮德尔菲法流程。第一轮是开放式问题。后续轮次使用5点李克特量表对陈述进行评分。就方案纳入、综合分数中的相对重要性以及分数解释征求了建议。
64%(47/73)的陈述主题达成了德尔菲法参与者共识,包括修订后的概念模型、具体评估方案、纵向跟踪的重要性以及各个方案和综合分数的相对重要性。关于睡眠时间的纳入、运动技能障碍课程评估的评估/评分以及总体身体素质素养分类的必要性仍存在不同意见。
修订后的CAPL模型(由日常行为涵盖的身体能力、动机和知识的重叠领域)适用于监测8至12岁儿童的身体素质素养。客观测量的领域(日常行为、身体能力)具有更高的相对重要性。随着更多数据可用,应重新评估CAPL结果的解释。