Suppr超能文献

《流行病学观察性研究报告加强规范:应答驱动抽样研究“STROBE-RDS”声明》

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: "STROBE-RDS" statement.

作者信息

White Richard G, Hakim Avi J, Salganik Matthew J, Spiller Michael W, Johnston Lisa G, Kerr Ligia, Kendall Carl, Drake Amy, Wilson David, Orroth Kate, Egger Matthias, Hladik Wolfgang

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;68(12):1463-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a new data collection methodology used to estimate characteristics of hard-to-reach groups, such as the HIV prevalence in drug users. Many national public health systems and international organizations rely on RDS data. However, RDS reporting quality and available reporting guidelines are inadequate. We carried out a systematic review of RDS studies and present Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for RDS Studies (STROBE-RDS), a checklist of essential items to present in RDS publications, justified by an explanation and elaboration document.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We searched the MEDLINE (1970-2013), EMBASE (1974-2013), and Global Health (1910-2013) databases to assess the number and geographical distribution of published RDS studies. STROBE-RDS was developed based on STROBE guidelines, following Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines.

RESULTS

RDS has been used in over 460 studies from 69 countries, including the USA (151 studies), China (70), and India (32). STROBE-RDS includes modifications to 12 of the 22 items on the STROBE checklist. The two key areas that required modification concerned the selection of participants and statistical analysis of the sample.

CONCLUSION

STROBE-RDS seeks to enhance the transparency and utility of research using RDS. If widely adopted, STROBE-RDS should improve global infectious diseases public health decision making.

摘要

目的

应答驱动抽样(RDS)是一种新的数据收集方法,用于估计难以接触人群的特征,如吸毒者中的艾滋病毒流行率。许多国家公共卫生系统和国际组织都依赖RDS数据。然而,RDS报告质量和现有报告指南并不完善。我们对RDS研究进行了系统综述,并提出了《加强流行病学观察性研究报告:RDS研究》(STROBE - RDS),这是一份RDS出版物中应呈现的基本项目清单,并配有解释和阐述文件。

研究设计与背景

我们检索了MEDLINE(1970 - 2013)、EMBASE(1974 - 2013)和全球健康(1910 - 2013)数据库,以评估已发表的RDS研究的数量和地理分布。STROBE - RDS是在《健康研究报告指南制定者指南》的基础上,根据STROBE指南制定的。

结果

RDS已在来自69个国家的460多项研究中使用,包括美国(151项研究)、中国(70项)和印度(32项)。STROBE - RDS对STROBE清单中的22项中的12项进行了修改。需要修改的两个关键领域涉及参与者的选择和样本的统计分析。

结论

STROBE - RDS旨在提高使用RDS进行研究的透明度和实用性。如果被广泛采用,STROBE - RDS应能改善全球传染病公共卫生决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ac5/4669303/5d477edf9921/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验