Suppr超能文献

4026 名美国退伍军人中基于索磷布韦的方案治疗 1 型和 2 型丙型肝炎病毒感染的疗效。

Effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based regimens in genotype 1 and 2 hepatitis C virus infection in 4026 U.S. Veterans.

机构信息

Office of Public Health/Population Health Program, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;42(5):559-73. doi: 10.1111/apt.13300. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Real-world effectiveness data are needed to inform hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment decisions.

AIM

To assess sustained virological response (SVR) of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in routine medical practice.

METHODS

Observational, intent-to-treat cohort analysis of genotype 1 and 2 HCV-infected veterans initiating SOF-based regimens with recommended treatment duration of 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Four thousand and twenty-six veterans with genotype 1 (N = 3203) and genotype 2 (N = 823) comprise the cohort. SVR rates for genotype 1 were 66.8% for SOF + peginterferon + ribavirin (RBV), 75.3% for SOF + simeprevir (SIM), 74.1% for SOF + SIM + RBV and for genotype 2 were 79.0% for SOF + RBV. Genotype 1 patients were less likely to achieve SVR with BMI ≥30 (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84, P < 0.001), a history of decompensated liver disease (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.71, P < 0.001), treatment experience (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.71, P < 0.001), APRI >2 (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36-0.55, P < 0.001) and with SOF + PEG + RBV compared with SOF + SIM (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40-0.62, P < 0.001). Age, sex, race/ethnicity, diabetes and genotype subtype did not predict SVR. Odds of achieving SVR with SOF + SIM + RBV did not differ compared with SOF + SIM (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.75-1.44, P = 0.86). Genotype 2 patients were less likely to achieve SVR with prior treatment experience (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.88, P = 0.009) and APRI >2 (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.62, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world cohort, SVR rates were lower than in clinical trials. Genotype 1 and 2 HCV-infected patients with advanced liver disease by APRI >2 or FIB-4 > 3.25 were significantly less likely to achieve SVR. For genotype 1, a SOF + SIM ± RBV regimen was associated with a higher likelihood of SVR.

摘要

背景

需要真实世界的疗效数据来为丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的治疗决策提供信息。

目的

评估在常规医疗实践中基于索非布韦(SOF)的方案的持续病毒学应答(SVR)。

方法

对接受基于 SOF 的方案治疗的基因型 1 和 2 HCV 感染退伍军人进行观察性、意向治疗队列分析,治疗持续时间为 12 周。

结果

该队列包括 4026 名基因型 1(N=3203)和基因型 2(N=823)退伍军人。基因型 1 的 SVR 率为 SOF+聚乙二醇干扰素+利巴韦林(RBV)为 66.8%,SOF+西美瑞韦(SIM)为 75.3%,SOF+SIM+RBV 为 74.1%,基因型 2 的 SVR 率为 SOF+RBV 为 79.0%。BMI≥30(OR 0.64,95%CI 0.49-0.84,P<0.001)、失代偿性肝病病史(OR 0.51,95%CI 0.36-0.71,P<0.001)、治疗经验(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.48-0.71,P<0.001)、APRI>2(OR 0.44,95%CI 0.36-0.55,P<0.001)和 SOF+PEG+RBV 治疗与 SOF+SIM 治疗相比,基因型 1 患者更不可能达到 SVR(OR 0.50,95%CI 0.40-0.62,P<0.001)。年龄、性别、种族/族裔、糖尿病和基因型亚型均不能预测 SVR。与 SOF+SIM 相比,SOF+SIM+RBV 治疗达到 SVR 的几率没有差异(OR 1.03,95%CI 0.75-1.44,P=0.86)。基因型 2 患者中,既往治疗经验(OR 0.55,95%CI 0.35-0.88,P=0.009)和 APRI>2(OR 0.39,95%CI 0.25-0.62,P<0.001)与 SVR 较低有关。

结论

在这个真实世界的队列中,SVR 率低于临床试验。APRI>2 或 FIB-4>3.25 的基因型 1 和 2 HCV 感染患者,肝脏疾病晚期,达到 SVR 的可能性显著降低。对于基因型 1,SOF+SIM±RBV 方案与更高的 SVR 可能性相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验