Suppr超能文献

钳子与圈套切除术在结直肠癌筛查中的应用:我们是否遵循了指南?

Forceps versus snare polypectomies in colorectal cancer screening: are we adhering to the guidelines?

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OEGGH) Quality Assurance Working Group, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):898-902. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392328. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening recommend snare resection for polyps > 5 mm. The aim of this study was to investigate polypectomy technique according to lesion size and shape, and to assess adherence of endoscopists enrolled in the national quality assurance program to the European guidelines.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cohort study included screening colonoscopies performed between 2007 and 2013 within a quality assurance program in Austria. Resection technique was analyzed according to lesion characteristics and endoscopy facility (private practices, hospitals, outpatient clinics) before publication of the EU guidelines (2007 - 2010) and adherence to the guidelines after publication (2011 - 2013). All surveillance colonoscopies and examinations with missing data were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 128 969 screening colonoscopies performed by 278 endoscopy units were included. The polyp detection rate was 39.6 % (n = 47 797) and 95.6 % of polyps were resected. Of polyps ≥ 5 mm, 46.0 % were resected using forceps and were therefore not treated in accordance with the guidelines. Forceps polypectomy of lesions 5 - 10 mm and > 10 mm decreased significantly in hospitals after implementation of the guidelines (both P < 0.0001). In private practices, there was no difference in forceps usage for polyps of 5 - 10 mm (P = 0.41) before and after the guidelines, and for polyps > 10 mm forceps usage even increased (P < 0.0001). Endoscopists' forceps removal rates for polyps ≥ 5 mm correlated significantly with respective adenoma detection rates (P = 0.0007, r p  - 0.187) and cecal intubation rates (P = 0.0001, r p  - 0.303). Among endoscopists in private practices, internists had slightly lower forceps removal rates for polyps ≥ 5 mm than surgeons, both before (47.2 % vs. 50.7 %; P = 0.014) and after publication of the guidelines (51.9 % vs. 53.5 %; P = 0.161).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the importance of the European guidelines. The inclusion of adequate resection technique as a quality indicator in colorectal cancer screening programs is recommended.

摘要

背景与研究目的

欧洲结直肠癌筛查质量保证指南建议对直径>5mm 的息肉采用圈套切除术。本研究旨在根据病变大小和形状,调查息肉切除术技术,并评估参加全国质量保证计划的内镜医师对欧洲指南的依从性。

患者和方法

本队列研究纳入了奥地利质量保证计划于 2007 年至 2013 年期间实施的筛查结肠镜检查。在欧盟指南发布之前(2007-2010 年),根据病变特征和内镜设施(私人诊所、医院、门诊)分析切除技术,在指南发布后(2011-2013 年)评估其对指南的依从性。所有随访结肠镜检查和数据缺失的检查均被排除。

结果

共纳入 278 个内镜单位的 128969 例筛查结肠镜检查。息肉检出率为 39.6%(n=47797),95.6%的息肉被切除。直径≥5mm 的息肉中,46.0%采用活检钳切除,因此不符合指南建议。在指南实施后,医院中直径 5-10mm 和>10mm 的息肉采用活检钳切除的比例显著下降(均 P<0.0001)。在私人诊所中,指南发布前后直径 5-10mm 的息肉(P=0.41)和>10mm 的息肉使用活检钳切除的比例没有差异,而且>10mm 的息肉使用活检钳切除的比例甚至增加(P<0.0001)。内镜医师切除直径≥5mm 的息肉的比例与相应的腺瘤检出率(P=0.0007,rp -0.187)和盲肠插管率(P=0.0001,rp -0.303)显著相关。在私人诊所的内镜医师中,内科医师的直径≥5mm 的息肉切除率略低于外科医师,指南发布前后分别为 47.2%和 50.7%(P=0.014)和 51.9%和 53.5%(P=0.161)。

结论

本研究证实了欧洲指南的重要性。建议将适当的切除技术作为结直肠癌筛查计划中的质量指标纳入。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验