• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.下消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Apr;5(3):309-334. doi: 10.1177/2050640617700014. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.下消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议
Endoscopy. 2017 Apr;49(4):378-397. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-103411. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
3
Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.小肠内镜的性能指标:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jun;51(6):574-598. doi: 10.1055/a-0889-9586. Epub 2019 May 10.
4
Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.小肠镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Jun;7(5):614-641. doi: 10.1177/2050640619850365. Epub 2019 May 15.
5
Performance measures for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和内镜超声检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1448-1460. doi: 10.1177/2050640618808157. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
6
Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.内镜服务的绩效指标:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)的一项质量改进倡议。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb;7(1):21-44. doi: 10.1177/2050640618810242. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
7
Adherence to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Performance Measures for Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Nationwide Survey From the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy.意大利消化内镜学会的全国性调查:上消化道和下消化道内镜检查对欧洲胃肠内镜学会质量绩效指标的依从性
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 6;9:868449. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.868449. eCollection 2022.
8
Performance measures for colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.结肠镜检查在炎症性肠病患者中的应用:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议。
Endoscopy. 2022 Sep;54(9):904-915. doi: 10.1055/a-1874-0946. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
9
Performance measures for endoscopy services: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.内镜服务的绩效评估指标:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议。
Endoscopy. 2018 Dec;50(12):1186-1204. doi: 10.1055/a-0755-7515. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.ERCP 和内镜超声的性能指标:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议。
Endoscopy. 2018 Nov;50(11):1116-1127. doi: 10.1055/a-0749-8767. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
[What is confirmed in colorectal cancer screening?].[结直肠癌筛查中确诊的是什么?]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s00108-025-01983-5.
2
Colon capsule endoscopy today: Brief overview of leading UK and Danish initiatives.今日的结肠胶囊内镜检查:英国和丹麦主要举措的简要概述。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jul 23;13:a26415952. doi: 10.1055/a-2641-5952. eCollection 2025.
3
Comprehensive application of artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer: A review.人工智能在结直肠癌中的综合应用:综述
iScience. 2025 Jun 23;28(7):112980. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112980. eCollection 2025 Jul 18.
4
A Prospective Randomized Study to Predict Bowel Preparation Quality Prior to Colonoscopy: Comparison of Two Stool Collection Methods for the Objective Assessment of Final Rectal Effluent Clarity.一项预测结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量的前瞻性随机研究:两种粪便收集方法用于客观评估最终直肠流出物清晰度的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 5;15(13):1717. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131717.
5
Adenoma Detection and the Endoscopist: Assessing the Effects of Insourcing in UK Endoscopy Services.腺瘤检测与内镜医师:评估英国内镜检查服务中内部采购的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 3;17(6):e85272. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85272. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Retrospective case-control study of the impact of dialysis on bowel preparation scores.透析对肠道准备评分影响的回顾性病例对照研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 May 12;13:a25658022. doi: 10.1055/a-2565-8022. eCollection 2025.
7
Follow-up endoscopy rates as an indicator of effectiveness in colon capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.随访内镜检查率作为结肠胶囊内镜检查有效性的指标:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 May 11;12(1):e001800. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001800.
8
Case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps per 100 procedures: a new candidate gold standard colonoscopy key performance indicator.每100例手术的病例组合调整后息肉平均数量:一种新的候选结肠镜检查金标准关键绩效指标。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 May 2;12(1):e001743. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001743.
9
Differences in colonoscopy performance among four endoscopy centers in Western Norway: Influence of case-mix.挪威西部四个内镜中心结肠镜检查表现的差异:病例组合的影响。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Apr 4;13:a25469515. doi: 10.1055/a-2546-9515. eCollection 2025.
10
Real-world effectiveness and safety of 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in patients aged 80 years or older.1L聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸用于80岁及以上患者肠道准备的真实世界有效性和安全性。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Feb 26;13:a25259938. doi: 10.1055/a-2525-9938. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative.上消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会质量改进倡议
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Oct;4(5):629-656. doi: 10.1177/2050640616664843. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
2
Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.上消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进计划
Endoscopy. 2016 Sep;48(9):843-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-113128. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
3
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Establishing the key unanswered research questions within gastrointestinal endoscopy.欧洲胃肠内镜学会——确定胃肠内镜领域关键的未解决研究问题。
Endoscopy. 2016 Oct;48(10):884-891. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-110398. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
4
Routine vs. on-demand analgesia in colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.结肠镜检查中常规与按需镇痛:一项随机临床试验。
Endoscopy. 2016 Sep;48(9):823-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108433. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
5
Post-Colonoscopy Complications: A Systematic Review, Time Trends, and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.结肠镜检查后并发症:基于人群研究的系统评价、时间趋势及荟萃分析
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug;111(8):1092-101. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.234. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于人群的结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):894-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.
7
Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy position statement.胃肠道内镜报告系统:促进质量改进的要求和标准:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会立场声明。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Apr;4(2):172-6. doi: 10.1177/2050640616629079. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
An explorative study from the Norwegian Quality Register Gastronet comparing self-estimated versus registered quality in colonoscopy performance.一项来自挪威胃肠内镜质量登记处的探索性研究,比较了结肠镜检查操作中自我评估的质量与登记的质量。
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E326-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100904. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
9
Predicting Colonoscopy Time: A Quality Improvement Initiative.预测结肠镜检查时间:一项质量改进计划。
Clin Endosc. 2016 Nov;49(6):555-559. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.110. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Time trends in quality indicators of colonoscopy.结肠镜检查质量指标的时间趋势。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Feb;4(1):110-20. doi: 10.1177/2050640615570147. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

下消化道内镜检查的性能指标:欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量改进倡议

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

作者信息

Kaminski Michal F, Thomas-Gibson Siwan, Bugajski Marek, Bretthauer Michael, Rees Colin J, Dekker Evelien, Hoff Geir, Jover Rodrigo, Suchanek Stepan, Ferlitsch Monika, Anderson John, Roesch Thomas, Hultcranz Rolf, Racz Istvan, Kuipers Ernst J, Garborg Kjetil, East James E, Rupinski Maciej, Seip Birgitte, Bennett Cathy, Senore Carlo, Minozzi Silvia, Bisschops Raf, Domagk Dirk, Valori Roland, Spada Cristiano, Hassan Cesare, Dinis-Ribeiro Mario, Rutter Matthew D

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Departments of Gastroenterological Oncology and Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Apr;5(3):309-334. doi: 10.1177/2050640617700014. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1177/2050640617700014
PMID:28507745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5415221/
Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90%); cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90%); adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25%); appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80%); complication rate (minimum standard not set); patient experience (minimum standard not set); appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.

摘要

欧洲胃肠内镜学会和欧洲胃肠病学联合会列出了一份下消化道内镜检查关键绩效指标的简短清单。我们建议欧洲各地的内镜检查服务机构采用以下七项下消化道内镜检查关键绩效指标,以便在中心和内镜医师层面的日常实践中进行测量和评估:充分肠道准备率(最低标准90%);盲肠插管率(最低标准90%);腺瘤检出率(最低标准25%);适当的息肉切除技术(最低标准80%);并发症发生率(未设定最低标准);患者体验(未设定最低标准);适当的息肉切除术后监测建议(未设定最低标准)。根据对其他已确定的绩效指标的重要性、科学可接受性、可行性、实用性以及与竞争指标的比较评估,已将其列为相关性较低的指标。