Suppr超能文献

女性在决定乳腺癌化学预防时关注什么?

What Matters to Women When Making Decisions About Breast Cancer Chemoprevention?

机构信息

Ann Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Building 16, 4th Floor, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.

Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Patient. 2016 Apr;9(2):149-59. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0134-z.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite the effectiveness of chemoprevention (tamoxifen and raloxifene) in preventing breast cancer among women at high risk for the disease, uptake is low. The objective of this study was to determine the tradeoff preferences for various attributes associated with chemoprevention among women not currently taking the drugs.

METHODS

We used rating-based conjoint analysis to evaluate the relative importance of a number of attributes associated with chemoprevention, including risk of side effects, drug effectiveness, time needed to take the drugs, and availability of a blood test to see if the drugs were working in an Internet sample of women. We generated mean importance values and part-worth utilities for all attribute levels associated with taking chemoprevention. We then used multivariable linear regression to examine attribute importance scores controlling for participant age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, educational level, and a family history of breast cancer.

RESULTS

Overall interest in taking chemoprevention was low among the 1094 women included in the analytic sample, even for the scenario in which participants would receive the greatest benefit and fewest risks associated with taking the drugs. Time needed to take the pill for it to work and 5-year risk of breast cancer were the most important attributes driving tradeoff preferences between the chemoprevention scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

Interest in taking chemoprevention among this sample of women at average risk was low. Addressing women's concerns about the time needed to take chemoprevention for it to work may help clinicians improve uptake of the drugs among those likely to benefit.

摘要

目的

尽管化学预防(他莫昔芬和雷洛昔芬)在预防高危女性乳腺癌方面有效,但使用率仍然很低。本研究旨在确定当前未服用这些药物的女性对与化学预防相关的各种属性的权衡偏好。

方法

我们使用基于评分的联合分析来评估与化学预防相关的许多属性的相对重要性,包括副作用风险、药物有效性、服用药物所需的时间,以及是否可以进行血液检查以了解药物是否有效。我们生成了与服用化学预防药物相关的所有属性水平的平均重要性值和部分价值效用。然后,我们使用多变量线性回归来检查控制参与者年龄、种族、西班牙裔、教育水平和乳腺癌家族史的属性重要性评分。

结果

在纳入分析样本的 1094 名女性中,对服用化学预防药物的总体兴趣较低,即使在参与者将从药物中获得最大收益和最小风险的情况下也是如此。服用药物以发挥作用所需的时间和 5 年乳腺癌风险是驱动化学预防方案之间权衡偏好的最重要属性。

结论

在平均风险的女性样本中,对服用化学预防药物的兴趣较低。解决女性对服用化学预防药物以发挥作用所需时间的担忧,可能有助于临床医生提高那些可能受益的人的药物使用率。

相似文献

1
What Matters to Women When Making Decisions About Breast Cancer Chemoprevention?
Patient. 2016 Apr;9(2):149-59. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0134-z.
4
Risk-benefit profiles of women using tamoxifen for chemoprevention.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 3;107(1):354. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju354. Print 2015 Jan.
6
Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Breast J. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):377-86. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12418. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
7
Chemoprevention of breast cancer.
South Med J. 2001 Jan;94(1):7-15.
8
Interest in breast cancer chemoprevention among older women.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Apr;108(3):435-53. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9614-8. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
9
Decision-making about tamoxifen in women at high risk for breast cancer: clinical and psychological factors.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 15;22(24):4951-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.192. Epub 2004 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of breast cancer risk reducing medications by breast cancer risk level in an older U.S. cohort.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2025 Aug;97:102856. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2025.102856. Epub 2025 May 31.
2
SREBP1-Dependent Metabolism as a Potential Target for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 14;17(10):1664. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101664.
7
Use of raloxifene and tamoxifen by breast cancer risk level in a Medicare-eligible cohort.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):606.e1-606.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.031. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
9
Physician and Patient Barriers to Breast Cancer Preventive Therapy.
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2016;8(3):158-164. doi: 10.1007/s12609-016-0216-5. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
10
Family health history reporting is sensitive to small changes in wording.
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1308-1311. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.45. Epub 2016 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying the utility of taking pills for cardiovascular prevention.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):155-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001240. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
2
Cancer statistics, 2015.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
4
Risk-benefit profiles of women using tamoxifen for chemoprevention.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 3;107(1):354. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju354. Print 2015 Jan.
5
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
6
Fertility clinicians and infertile patients in China have different preferences in fertility care.
Hum Reprod. 2014 Apr;29(4):712-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu023. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
7
Primary-care patients' trade-off preferences with regard to antidepressants.
Psychol Med. 2014 Aug;44(11):2301-8. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713003103. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
9
Trade-off preferences regarding adjuvant endocrine therapy among women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2324-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt195. Epub 2013 May 23.
10
Breast cancer anxiety's associations with responses to a chemoprevention decision aid.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验