Yoon Mee Sun, Park Won, Huh Seung Jae, Kim Hak Jae, Kim Young Seok, Kim Yong Bae, Kim Joo-Young, Lee Jong-Hoon, Kim Hun Jung, Cha Jihye, Kim Jin Hee, Kim Juree, Yoon Won Sup, Choi Jin Hwa, Chun Mison, Choi Youngmin, Chang Sei Kyung, Lee Kang Kyoo, Kim Myungsoo
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.030. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
To investigate whether combined chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) confers a benefit for survival outcome over radiotherapy (RT) alone after primary surgery in patients with FIGO stage IIIC endometrial adenocarcinoma.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with surgical stage IIIC endometrial cancer from 1990 to 2011. Adjuvant RT alone was performed in 85 patients (40.3%) and adjuvant CTRT in 126 patients (59.7%). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.
Stage IIIC1 and stage IIIC2 accounted for 63% and 37%, respectively. FIGO IIIC2 had a higher recurrence rate than FIGO IIIC1 (38.5% vs. 29.3%, p=0.172). Five-year OS and DFS were lower in FIGO IIIC2 than FIGO IIIC1 (85.1% vs. 76.9%, p=0.417; 71.0% vs. 59.2%, p=0.108, respectively). Eighteen patients (13.5%) in stage IIIC1 developed PALN recurrence, whereas only one (3.3%) in stage IIIC2 had PALN recurrence (p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, predictors of DFS were parametrial invasion (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.83-6.64; p<0.001), higher grade (HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.31-5.89; p=0.008), and >3 positive pelvic nodes (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.11-3.05; p=0.019). Combined CTRT did not affect DFS or OS in IIIC1 and IIIC2 compared with RT alone.
CTRT showed comparable survival outcome to RT alone. Half of relapses (46%) in stage IIIC1 occurred in PALN region, whereas relapse in stage IIIC2 primarily occurred in distant metastasis (90%). Future randomized studies are needed to determine which subgroup may be most likely to benefit from CCRT.
探讨对于国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IIIC期子宫内膜腺癌患者,在初次手术后,与单纯放疗(RT)相比,同步放化疗(CTRT)是否能改善生存结局。
我们对1990年至2011年手术分期为IIIC期子宫内膜癌患者进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。85例患者(40.3%)接受单纯辅助放疗,126例患者(59.7%)接受辅助同步放化疗。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型分析无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。
IIIC1期和IIIC2期分别占63%和37%。FIGO IIIC2期的复发率高于FIGO IIIC1期(38.5%对29.3%,p = 0.172)。FIGO IIIC2期的5年总生存期和无病生存期低于FIGO IIIC1期(分别为85.1%对76.9%,p = 0.417;71.0%对59.2%,p = 0.108)。IIIC1期18例患者(13.5%)发生盆腔淋巴结复发,而IIIC2期仅1例患者(3.3%)发生盆腔淋巴结复发(p = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,DFS的预测因素为宫旁浸润(HR,3.49;95%CI,1.83 - 6.64;p < 0.001)、高分级(HR,2.78;95%CI,1.31 - 5.89;p = 0.008)以及盆腔淋巴结阳性数>3个(HR,1.84;95%CI,1.11 - 3.05;p = 0.019)。与单纯放疗相比,同步放化疗对IIIC1期和IIIC2期的DFS或OS无影响。
同步放化疗与单纯放疗的生存结局相当。IIIC1期一半的复发(46%)发生在盆腔淋巴结区域,而IIIC2期的复发主要发生在远处转移(90%)。未来需要进行随机研究以确定哪些亚组最有可能从同步放化疗中获益。