Stancheva Nadezhda, Dannhauer Karl-Heinz, Hemprich Alexander, Krey Karl-Friedrich
Department of Orthodontics, University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Sep;76(5):391-404. doi: 10.1007/s00056-015-0299-z.
The purpose of this work was to analyse early upper-jaw development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated using two different concepts and to compare shape and size developments between these two groups and a group of noncleft patients.
A total of 204 maxillary casts available for this study from 50 UCLP patients were analyzed for upper-jaw development based on three-dimensional measurements performed with a Reflex Microscope from birth up to 71 months of age. Thirty-five of these 50 patients were part of an early treatment group (two-stage cleft closure with single-stage palatoplasty at an age of 10-14 months) and 15 were part of a late treatment group (two-stage cleft closure with palatoplasty at an age of 4-7 years). The control group included 39 casts of 17 noncleft patients.
Analysis of shape and size between the patients in the three groups yielded statistically significant differences between the cleft and the noncleft patients. In both treatment groups, we made observations typically associated with cleft formation like lateralization, asymmetry of the greater and lesser cleft segments, and pronounced vertical deviations of the segments. Viewed in all dimensions, however, the patients in the early treatment group approached the control group more closely, although a statistically significant difference was still observed.
Our results suggest that the timing of hard-palate closure is not a decisive factor for upper-jaw development. Intrinsic factors (initial cleft width, presence of tooth buds) and the surgeon's skills appear to have a much more defining role.
本研究旨在分析采用两种不同理念治疗的单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者的早期上颌骨发育情况,并比较这两组患者与一组非腭裂患者之间的形态和大小发育差异。
本研究共分析了50例UCLP患者的204个上颌模型,通过使用反射显微镜进行三维测量,从出生至71个月龄观察上颌骨发育情况。这50例患者中,35例属于早期治疗组(10 - 14个月龄时进行两阶段唇裂修复及单阶段腭裂修复),15例属于晚期治疗组(4 - 7岁时进行两阶段唇裂修复及腭裂修复)。对照组包括17例非腭裂患者的39个模型。
三组患者之间的形态和大小分析显示,腭裂患者与非腭裂患者之间存在统计学显著差异。在两个治疗组中,我们都观察到了一些通常与腭裂形成相关的现象,如侧化、大小腭裂段的不对称以及各段明显的垂直偏差。然而,从所有维度来看,早期治疗组的患者与对照组更为接近,尽管仍存在统计学显著差异。
我们的结果表明,硬腭关闭的时机并非上颌骨发育的决定性因素。内在因素(初始腭裂宽度、牙胚的存在)和外科医生的技术似乎起着更为决定性的作用。