Marchica Cinzia L, Saliba Issam
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2015 Jun 24;8:23-31. doi: 10.4137/CMent.s27284. eCollection 2015.
To identify whether measurement of the prosthesis length is mandatory in patients requiring otosclerosis surgeries and to assess their postoperative audiometric outcomes. In addition, evaluation of prosthesis length used in revision compared to primary stapedectomy was carried out.
Case series with chart review.
Chart review of 393 patients undergoing primary (321) versus revision stapedectomy (72) was performed in a tertiary referral center. The indication for surgery was the presence or persistence/recurrence of an air-bone gap (ABG) greater than 20 dB. Air and bone conduction thresholds (ACT and BCT, respectively), ABG as well as pure tone averages (PTAs) were determined for all patients, and the results were compared preoperatively and postoperatively.
Prosthesis length used ranged from 3.0 to 6.0 mm without differences between primary and revision groups. Of the revision surgeries, 62.5% were stapedectomies versus stapedotomies (P < 0.001). Patients showed significant decrease in speech discrimination score, with increased air and bone conduction thresholds as well as mean ABG and PTA before the revision surgeries as a first procedure failure. Prosthesis length changes occurred in 73.5% of the cases, with an average absolute change of 0.55 mm. Prosthesis length did not affect postoperative audiometric results between primary and revision groups, in all surgeries combined. When grouping stapes surgery into accurately versus inaccurately measured incus-footplate distance, significant differences were observed in prosthesis length employed (P < 0.01). Hearing outcomes were also better in the group in which an accurately measured prosthesis was chosen, as opposed to "standard-length" prosthesis.
This study corroborates postoperative success rates of revision surgeries, which show smaller improvements in hearing compared to a primary intervention. Accurate intra-operative measurement of prosthesis length was correlated with better audiometric results postoperatively.
确定在需要进行耳硬化症手术的患者中,测量人工听骨长度是否为必需,并评估其术后听力测试结果。此外,还对翻修手术与初次镫骨切除术所使用的人工听骨长度进行了评估。
病例系列研究并进行图表回顾。
在一家三级转诊中心对393例行初次(321例)与翻修镫骨切除术(72例)的患者进行图表回顾。手术指征为气骨导间距(ABG)大于20dB的存在或持续/复发。测定所有患者的气导和骨导阈值(分别为ACT和BCT)、ABG以及纯音平均值(PTA),并对术前和术后结果进行比较。
所使用的人工听骨长度范围为3.0至6.0mm,初次手术组与翻修手术组之间无差异。在翻修手术中,62.5%为镫骨切除术与镫骨足板开窗术(P<0.001)。患者的言语辨别得分显著下降,在作为首次手术失败的翻修手术前,气导和骨导阈值以及平均ABG和PTA均升高。73.5%的病例发生了人工听骨长度变化,平均绝对变化为0.55mm。在所有手术中,人工听骨长度在初次手术组和翻修手术组之间均未影响术后听力测试结果。当将镫骨手术分为砧骨-足板距离测量准确与不准确两组时,所使用的人工听骨长度存在显著差异(P<0.01)。与选择“标准长度”人工听骨相比,选择测量准确的人工听骨组的听力结果也更好。
本研究证实了翻修手术的术后成功率,与初次干预相比,其听力改善较小。术中准确测量人工听骨长度与术后更好的听力测试结果相关。