Abraham Jame, Robidoux André, Tan Antoinette R, Limentani Steven, Sturtz Keren, Shalaby Ibrahim, Alcorn Hope, Buyse Marc E, Wolmark Norman, Jacobs Samuel A
NSABP Foundation, Inc., Nova Tower 2, Two Allegheny Center, 12th Flr., Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(2):399-405. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3466-4. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is a good setting in which to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to downsize the tumor (which facilitates breast-conserving surgery), and to test newer agents in untreated patients. Eribulin (E) has shown activity in patients who have undergone previous taxane, anthracycline, and capecitabine treatment. We aimed to evaluate the neoadjuvant use of E followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in patients with HER2-negative LABC, using as a control a randomized group of women who received weekly paclitaxel (WP). Fifty women with LABC were accrued January-August 2013. Patients were randomized (1:2) to receive either WP (N = 19) for 12 treatments or E (N = 31) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by AC every 3 weeks for 4 cycles before surgery. 17/19 patients who took WP and 25/30 who took E completed all cycles. Patients were evaluated by clinical examination and breast MRI at baseline and after completion of E or WP. Surgical pCR in breast and lymph nodes was determined by a local pathologist following chemotherapy. Forty-nine patients received ≥1 dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are included in this analysis. Forty-eight underwent surgery; one had disease that was inoperable (on E) and is included as no-pCR patient. 17/19 of these patients who took WP completed 12 doses; 28/30 on E completed 4 cycles. Six discontinued treatment on WP, E, or AC. Both treatments were well tolerated. pCR on WP = 5/19(26 %) and on E = 5/30(17 %). Both regimens were equally well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. pCR did not suggest higher activity with E than with other standard regimens in these LABC patients.
局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)是监测新辅助化疗反应、缩小肿瘤大小(便于保乳手术)以及在未治疗患者中测试新型药物的理想环境。艾瑞布林(E)已在先前接受过紫杉烷、蒽环类药物和卡培他滨治疗的患者中显示出活性。我们旨在评估在HER2阴性的LABC患者中先使用E然后使用多柔比星和环磷酰胺(AC)进行新辅助治疗的效果,将一组接受每周紫杉醇(WP)治疗的随机女性作为对照。2013年1月至8月招募了50例LABC患者。患者被随机分组(1:2),分别接受12次治疗的WP(N = 19)或每3周一次共4个周期的E(N = 31),然后在手术前每3周一次共4个周期的AC。接受WP治疗的17/19例患者和接受E治疗的25/30例患者完成了所有周期。在基线以及E或WP治疗完成后,通过临床检查和乳腺MRI对患者进行评估。化疗后由当地病理学家确定乳腺和淋巴结的手术完全缓解(pCR)情况。49例患者接受了≥1剂新辅助化疗并纳入本分析。48例患者接受了手术;1例患者疾病无法手术(接受E治疗),作为非pCR患者纳入。这些接受WP治疗的患者中有17/19例完成了12剂治疗;接受E治疗的28/30例完成了4个周期。6例患者在WP、E或AC治疗中停止治疗。两种治疗的耐受性均良好。WP治疗的pCR率为5/19(26%),E治疗的pCR率为5/30(17%)。两种方案的耐受性同样良好,未出现意外毒性。在这些LABC患者中,pCR结果并未表明E比其他标准方案具有更高的活性。