Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No.5, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. BRA IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 26;7(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0754-1.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), a standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer patients, is widely used for early breast cancer patients also. The varying role of regimens used as NACT needs to be investigated. Despite availability of some randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear which treatment regimen suits best. Further, there is no study comparing all the three regimens. Accordingly, present study will compare the efficacy of anthracyclines, taxanes, and targeted therapy administered in neoadjuvant setting on the basis of oncological outcomes and functional outcomes.
METHOD/DESIGN: Online databases PubMed and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials will be searched to acquire eligible studies. Further, content of relevant journals, references of relevant articles, and proceedings of major related conference will also be searched. The RCTs comparing any of abovementioned regimen as NACT on breast cancer patients will be eligible. Two reviewers independently and in duplicate will screen the records on the basis of title and abstract and complete full-text review to determine eligibility. Similarly, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be done by two independent reviewers. The pair-wise meta-analysis as well as network meta-analysis will be conducted to assess the relative efficacy of anthracyclines, taxanes, and targeted therapy regimens.
The present systematic review will improve the understanding of the relative efficacies of the three treatment regimens and possibly guide the clinical practices by providing the current best evidence on the efficacy of various regimens of NACT in the management of breast cancer patients.
PROSPERO ( CRD42016027236 ).
新辅助化疗(NACT)是局部晚期乳腺癌患者的标准治疗方法,也广泛用于早期乳腺癌患者。需要研究作为 NACT 使用的方案的不同作用。尽管有一些随机对照试验(RCT),但不清楚哪种治疗方案最适合。此外,没有研究比较所有三种方案。因此,本研究将根据肿瘤学结果和功能结果比较新辅助治疗中使用的蒽环类药物、紫杉烷类和靶向治疗的疗效。
方法/设计:将在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记册在线数据库中搜索以获取合格的研究。此外,还将搜索相关期刊的内容、相关文章的参考文献和主要相关会议的会议记录。将合格的 RCT 比较上述任何一种方案作为 NACT 用于乳腺癌患者。两名审查员将独立地、重复地筛选标题和摘要基础上的记录,并进行完整的全文审查以确定合格性。同样,数据提取和偏倚风险评估将由两名独立的审查员进行。将进行两两荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析,以评估蒽环类药物、紫杉烷类和靶向治疗方案的相对疗效。
本系统评价将提高对三种治疗方案相对疗效的理解,并通过提供 NACT 各种方案在乳腺癌患者管理中的当前最佳证据,可能指导临床实践。
PROSPERO(CRD42016027236)。