Ebach Malte C, Gillu Anthony C, Kwan Alan, Ahyong Shane T, Murphy Daniel J, Cassis Gerasimos
School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.
Zootaxa. 2013;3619:315-42. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3619.3.4.
The large number, definition, varied application and validity of named Australian biogeographical regions reflect their ad hoc development via disparate methods or case study idiosyncracies. They do not represent a coherent system. In order to resolve these uncertainties an Australian Bioregionalisation Atlas is proposed as a provisional hierarchical classification, accounting for all known named areas. This provisional area taxonomy includes a diagnosis, description, type locality and map for each named area within the Australian continent, as well as a first-ever area synonymy. Akin to biological classifications, this Atlas seeks to provision universality, objectivity and stability, such that biogeographers, macroecologists and geographers, can test existing areas as well as proposing novel areas. With such a formalised and comparative system in place, practitioners can analyse the definition and relationships of biotic areas, and putatively minimise ad hoc explanations.
澳大利亚命名的生物地理区域数量众多、定义各异、应用多样且有效性存疑,这反映出它们是通过不同方法或个案研究的特性临时发展起来的。它们并不代表一个连贯的系统。为了解决这些不确定性问题,现提出一份澳大利亚生物区域化地图集,作为一个临时的层级分类,涵盖所有已知的命名区域。这个临时的区域分类法包括对澳大利亚大陆内每个命名区域的诊断、描述、模式产地和地图,以及有史以来的首个区域同义词表。与生物分类类似,这份地图集旨在实现普遍性、客观性和稳定性,以便生物地理学家、宏观生态学家和地理学家能够检验现有区域并提出新的区域。有了这样一个形式化且具可比性的系统,从业者就能分析生物区域的定义和关系,并尽可能减少临时解释。