Cave M H, Doherty C C, Douglas J F, McGeown M G, Donaldson R A, Kennedy J A, Middleton D
Ir J Med Sci. 1989 Nov;158(11):267-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02942066.
Live donor renal transplants are often preferred to cadaver grafts because of better graft survival. In a retrospective study of 41 live donor transplants performed in the Belfast Renal Unit from 1971 until November 1988, actual graft survival at 2 and 5 years was 84% and 69% respectively. Corresponding patient survival rates were 87% and 81%. These results are no better than those of cadaver grafts. A subdivision of patients considered to be relatively poor risk for transplantation showed less favourable results than those who were good risk. 15% of the donors suffered post-operative complications, which occurred more often in older donors. Live donor transplantation is not necessarily preferable to cadaver organ graft, and is not recommended for poor risk recipients or donors aged over 50 years.
由于活体供肾移植的移植物存活率更高，所以通常比尸体供肾移植更受青睐。在一项对1971年至1988年11月间在贝尔法斯特肾脏科进行的41例活体供肾移植的回顾性研究中，2年和5年时的实际移植物存活率分别为84%和69%。相应的患者存活率分别为87%和81%。这些结果并不比尸体供肾移植的结果更好。被认为移植风险相对较高的患者亚组的结果不如风险较低的患者。15%的供者出现术后并发症，且在年龄较大的供者中更常发生。活体供肾移植不一定比尸体器官移植更可取，不建议移植风险高的受者或年龄超过50岁的供者进行活体供肾移植。
